Page 1 of 2

Premium being beefed up

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 20:35
by Decker
http://www.oag.com/oag/website/com/en/H ... rks+150706

As a normal UC traveller that amenity kit looks pretty impressive [}:)][:p][:I].

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 20:46
by Neil
link does not seem to work??

Neil

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 20:47
by FamilyMan
Originally posted by Decker
Article here. As a normal UC traveller that amenity kit looks prettty impressive [}:)][:p][:I].

Sorry Decker

Link does not work for me. Think it needed '+'s. Try this.

Phil

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 20:48
by Neil
Still nothing Phil

Neil

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 20:50
by VS-EWR

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 20:50
by Decker
You are correct that it needs + ; problem is this is escaped out to space. So everyone click on the link and when it 404s on you replace - with + in the link!

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 20:52
by Littlejohn
Originally posted by VS-EWR
not! Working Link


Sorry Nick

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 20:53
by VS-EWR
Now it should!

TESTING:

http://www.oag.com/oag/website/com/en/H ... rks+150706

Okay, now no one shorten this link, it's the only way it works!

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 20:54
by jamie
I can't see any + to substitute!

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 20:57
by Decker
Good catch Nick

Posting the URL directly gets around the escaping of + to %20.

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 20:58
by MarkJ
""-" replaced by "+""

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 21:00
by David
Apart from a newspaper, a few extra bits in your amenity kit and "express economy baggage reclaim" is there anything of substance.

[B)] (runs off to hide)

David

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 21:01
by MarkJ
Am I missing something - I cannot see anything that's new in the list of what you get - where's the "beefing up"?

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 21:02
by jamie
Thanks VS-EWR. Works ok now.

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 21:04
by MarkJ
Originally posted by David
Apart from a newspaper, a few extra bits in your amenity kit and "express economy baggage reclaim" is there anything of substance.

[B)] (runs off to hide)

David


Thats what I thought - and you get all of that now!!

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 21:11
by Littlejohn
safety net for those who are no longer rich enough(...) to travel Business but have too few tattoos and body piercings to feel entirely comfortable among the denizens of Zoo Class.
[:0][B)]

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 21:12
by Decker
Yes did register an ouch with that one.

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 21:13
by Richard28
Originally posted by MarkJ
Am I missing something - I cannot see anything that's new in the list of what you get - where's the "beefing up"?


I think Decker is referring to the dumbing down of the Upper Class Amenity kit - PE's kit is very good in comparrison!

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 21:16
by Decker
and the article refers to it as an improvement in PE... :)

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 21:19
by mid-class
liked the para

"By rights, Virgin Atlantic should have called its Premium Economy cabin Middle Class"

for those that were not flying virgin 10 years or so ago, PE was originally called Mid-Class but was changed to PE so as to not dilute business class, ie UC traffic

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 21:33
by AndyK
""When times are tough Premium Economy is the safety ne to travel Business but have too few tattoos and body piercings to feel entirely comfortable among the denizens of Zoo Class.

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 21:38
by MarkJ
Originally posted by Richard28
Originally posted by MarkJ
Am I missing something - I cannot see anything that's new in the list of what you get - where's the "beefing up"?


I think Decker is referring to the dumbing down of the Upper Class Amenity kit - PE's kit is very good in comparrison!


No, I got what he meant - and its nothing that Decker has said - its the article - it talks about improvements to PE and I cannot find any improvements - everything listed is - I beleive- already available to PE passengers:D

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 21:39
by Littlejohn
Originally posted by AndyK

Ignorant remark about tattoos and piercings.

No doubt an indication of the quality of the rest of the artical. I gave up reading newspapers in 1984, and pompous stories like this were one of the reasons. Maybe I should expand it to the media in general.

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 21:53
by ade99
Originally posted by MarkJ
Originally posted by Richard28
Originally posted by MarkJ
Am I missing something - I cannot see anything that's new in the list of what you get - where's the "beefing up"?


I think Decker is referring to the dumbing down of the Upper Class Amenity kit - PE's kit is very good in comparrison!


No, I got what he meant - and its nothing that Decker has said - its the article - it talks about improvements to PE and I cannot find any improvements - everything listed is - I beleive- already available to PE passengers:D


Yeh but the improvement is there's not going to be any cut backs!!! :D

PostPosted: 04 Jul 2006, 22:18
by slinky09
What a crap article ... yes the PE amenity kit is now better than UC, but the rest ... silly ... where was the news about beefing up?

Ho hum [}:)]