Virgin Semi-Galactic?

The content in the latest news story has got me thinking.
70 miles, they say - where you can see for "1,000 miles in each direction". Now, look at the background of the image of the "spacecraft". How far do you think you can see in that? (hint: It's a LOT more than a 1,000 mile radius)
So, let's put it into a bit of context:
I jump out of planes at 4.5 miles up. Nice view, but not exactly space
A 747 can cruise at 7.8 miles.
Concorde used to cruise at 11.3 miles. From there, you could see the "curvature of the earth" - but hardly "space".
Now, SATELLITES - well, they "cruise" at around 250 miles up.
Now, the view. New York to San Francisco is roughly 3,000 miles. Remember when you've seen those images of space and spacecraft, with half of the earth in the background? Well, you're not exactly going to see that - you won't even be able to see the across the USA.
My point? Well, this "space travel" thing is all very cool - but I fear a little over-hyped. After all, you don't even get to leave the atmosphere. [n]
70 miles, they say - where you can see for "1,000 miles in each direction". Now, look at the background of the image of the "spacecraft". How far do you think you can see in that? (hint: It's a LOT more than a 1,000 mile radius)
So, let's put it into a bit of context:
I jump out of planes at 4.5 miles up. Nice view, but not exactly space

A 747 can cruise at 7.8 miles.
Concorde used to cruise at 11.3 miles. From there, you could see the "curvature of the earth" - but hardly "space".
Now, SATELLITES - well, they "cruise" at around 250 miles up.
Now, the view. New York to San Francisco is roughly 3,000 miles. Remember when you've seen those images of space and spacecraft, with half of the earth in the background? Well, you're not exactly going to see that - you won't even be able to see the across the USA.
My point? Well, this "space travel" thing is all very cool - but I fear a little over-hyped. After all, you don't even get to leave the atmosphere. [n]