I highly doubt it (sadly). It seems that if there is joined up thinking between VH and VS at the moment the way forward is the V Room. The current V Room space at MAN could easily have been a CH but clearly it was decided that it was to be a V Room. Clearly V Rooms are more "open" to a wider range of passengers.
Would their be enough of a J yield to warrant it? I know SFO has a CH but it is an entirely different type of destination really in terms of yields and class make up.
If anything then a V Room is more likely. But as with all things VS, nothing surprises me these days.
slinky09 wrote:
That said, I would like VS to expand more out of MAN, if EK can put on three flights a day to DXB I don't see why for example VS couldn't compete ... maybe they've lost that one now, but there are other options and MAN does deserve a clubhouse IMO. It would make a really great differentiator.
Slinks you cannot compare VS and EK operations at MAN. The reason why EK put three flights a day is because the vast majority of MAN originating paseengers using EK are not going to DXB as their final destination. Not only are they surving a large proporition of the Kangaroo route passengers ex MAN but then there is the huge Pakistani/Indian/Bangladeshi/Sri Lankan etc etc etc communities that will use the EK DXB flights to connect to flights back to their respective mother lands.
If VS were to open up MAN operations they would not have the same kind of demand as EK at all. They would not be operating into a hub as EK would be. Their operations would be a lot more point to point and thus would not carry such demand. Very few airlines in the world can be compared to EK...those that spring to mind with such a hub system (who are trying to emulate EK) are EY, Oman Air (watch the name) and even TK.