david_itl wrote:
Actually it does say Gatwick and Manchester. But I am reliably informed that St Lucia is not going to be announced shortly but another former bmi Caribbean destination
So thats ANU then.
I dont see VS entering into the MAN-NYC market, as pointed out it is fairly saturated with US legacy carriers at the moment, all with fairly loyal corporate customers who fill the seats up front.
However MAN is in desperate need for some routes. In particular a US West Coast route, would imagine LAX would be the most likely. Many commentators have been stating for a while that US West Coast is an untapped market. There could also be a good opportunity for VS to pick up on connecting passengers through to AKL given the links between NZ and VS. Discussions have been had many a time on a.net with regards to a possible NZ service into MAN but the general consensus was that it would be better connecting to a UK based carrier at LAX.
The other 'black hole' seems to be a far eastern destination, most probably HKG. The general feeling was that MAN needed SIN or HKG. SIN is now back however HKG would be a nice addition. But of course the route faces quite stiff competition from SQ, QR, EY and EK all via their respective hubs.
It is going to be interesting to see how VS play MAN. The initial indications are that it is going to be used to grow leisure orientated routes. This follows the trend of VS of late, LGW has remained fairly positive in the economic downturn (after all us Brits love our holidays), and the leisure orientated routes seem to be performing well (this also seems to be echoed by BA's decision to start SSH and MLE from LGW to tap into the leisure market). It does make sense, for now, to follow the leisure routes as they are guaranteed bums on seats but importantly dont always give the yields. So I am hoping in the longer term VS will introduce some more "true" scheduled routes from MAN and make a real go of it.