slinky09 wrote:Sometimes I wonder if there's an anti-VS campaign on Skytrax ...
I doubt it; I think the disappointment is real. I agree with Concorde RIP that part of the problem is that expectations can be high. I imagine that quite a lot of people who fly from LGW to holiday destinations are spending (very) hard-earned savings on a trip the likes of which they will not be able to repeat every year. So it's a big disappointment when a special holiday starts with a grubby and tatty old plane. Also, if you don't fly frequently, the gradual degradation of the flying experience comes as much more of a shock. I didn't fly long-haul between 1998 and 2005 and I was truly shocked by the extent of the change in those years.
But there are other variables in the equation and they all change constantly.
For instance, competing products. Last week there was a thread on this website that was comparing AA transatlantic economy favourably with VS. I've seen good write-ups of AA F versus BA F. We all know that some Middle and Far Eastern carriers are rated higher than most European and American airlines. So you have to run fast just to stay still. Is VS running fast enough?
It's worth keeping Skytrax reviews in perspective, of course. If a flight gets one negative review, there may be another 200 passengers who were perfectly happy. However, the worrying thing for VS, in my opinion, is that frequently the complaints do not relate to aspects of the passenger's personal experience that only he or she would have experienced (e.g. rants about a particular exchange with cabin crew, or something similar). Instead, the complaints relate to things that are shared by everyone -- aircraft cleanliness, toilet smells, quality of food, huge mismatch of advertising and reality. That seems pretty worrying to me.
I should say again that I enjoy flying VS and have had consistently great experiences regardless of route and cabin ex-LHR.