For all non-Virgin travel topics, with subforums for popular common themes.
#436158 by Darren Wheeler
25 Feb 2008, 19:29
I remember Dispatches 'investigation' into Ryanair. Guess who came out better?
#436160 by locutus
25 Feb 2008, 19:39
Originally posted by Darren Wheeler
I remember Dispatches 'investigation' into Ryanair. Guess who came out better?


My old company was on Watchdog, we sold a lot more holidays the next day than usual. [:?]
#436412 by willd
27 Feb 2008, 09:20
I felt it was the typical one sided stuff we normally get from Dispatches. I was massively disappointed that the programme turned into BAA Bashing.
#436414 by Neil
27 Feb 2008, 09:30
Originally posted by willd
I felt it was the typical one sided stuff we normally get from Dispatches. I was massively disappointed that the programme turned into BAA Bashing.


I forgot about this thread.

I too was very disappointed with this programme. From the adverts it made out it was going to show serious security breaches at UK airports but like you say Will it just turned out to be about anything and everything they could find to make BAA look bad. I really don't see what the programme makers were trying to achieve with it, some of the 'findings' were ridiculous nothings and I thought the whole thing was really badly presented.
#436421 by jaguarpig
27 Feb 2008, 11:41
make BAA look bad

Think BAA do a good job of that without the help of dispatches lol
#436431 by willd
27 Feb 2008, 13:38
I have just caught a glimpse of todays FT headline in the lobby downstairs- it says the CEO of BAA is to leave.

All in all I thought the programme was very poor and was left wondering if it was funded by Greenpeace.
#436438 by McMaddog
27 Feb 2008, 14:07
One thing it brought to attention was the possible length of queues - I've never queued at LHR more than 15 minutes, maybe I'm just lucky, but that queue they featured was almost beyond belief, and since there were enough retractable belt barriers to cover the length I'm guessing this may not have been a one off. It looked to me as if the queue started in the car park?
#436441 by Neil
27 Feb 2008, 14:20
The queue was pretty ridiculous. I thought it must have been at a really busy time but it seems it was February 2007, wonder what on earth cause it, can't remember anything specific that happened then?

Thank god for the new private VS security channel eh!
#436442 by McMaddog
27 Feb 2008, 14:23
Originally posted by Neil
it seems it was February 2007, wonder what on earth cause it, can't remember anything specific that happened then?

It looked like T3 - the only thing I can think of could be Chinese New Year, but even so that would only mean full loadings on a few flights. So dunno really.
#436448 by Darren Wheeler
27 Feb 2008, 14:51
it could be caused by anything. Shortage of screeners due a bug going round, a scanner failed, stupid people not under standing the 'no liquid' rule, or the building had been evacuated and just let back in.

Showing a queue without context is just showing a line of people.
#436453 by McMaddog
27 Feb 2008, 15:10
Maybe it's time for V-Flyers to start assisting the tracking! The programme accused BAA of lying, hopefully PAX themselves don't. Report here
#436686 by Darren Wheeler
29 Feb 2008, 13:08
Having just watched this on 4oD, hardly anything out of the blue there. LHR is mainly for shopping? Yep, we know that. It's getting busy! Umm, yep. It's noisy on the flightpath! Err, ditto....

Somehow I don't think C4 will be invited to go airside again in a while.
Virgin Atlantic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Itinerary Calendar