quote:Originally posted by Dave2009
What I can never understand is if its a weather delay why the airline even let them board knowing that the plane won't be going anywhere. I've heard in the past from people that they won't let you get off and won't let you have food and also won't turn on the iflight entertainment - personally I would be really annoyed if this happened.
They want the gate for another aircraft usually.
The problem here is that a simple rule, aimed at resolving a quite serious problem, has so many potentialities itself that it could become a nuisance. What happens, people are asking, if you get on the plane, a thunderstorm comes over, delays take off, you get in the runway queue then the pilot realises the new take off time is 3hrs 2mins past departure? According to the rule, it's back to the gate or fined, but people wouldn't want that.
On the other hand there was a cause celebre in the US recently when a regional jet headed to Minneapolis was diverted to Rochester (I think) then no one (airline, airport, crew) allowed the passengers off for over twelve hours as the airport shut down around them. Massive incompetence on all parts, which this new rule is intended to resolve.
Yet airlines are up in arms, they won't admit to their failings, fix problems themselves, get 'injuncted' then moan.
There's a plane at JFK, to fly you back from far away
all those dark and frantic transatlantic miles