Just got a schedule change for VS104 ATL-LHR on Apr 30. Was a 350 but now changed to a 339.
Does anyone know if any row in PE is missing windows like row 21 on a 333?
Does anyone know if any row in PE is missing windows like row 21 on a 333?
ashs350K wrote:After reading many many posts on multiple forums I am fully convinced VS know what they’re doing here; bait and switch. It’s very easy for them to see bookings in UC go down where aircraft type is 333 or 787. So they maximise using 339 and 351 as placeholder on routes where they operate these. Overpromise under deliver.
LREDI wrote:I think it's incredibly unlikely VS are moving aircraft positions around as you outline. Various factors can impact planning - including unexpected tech issues - which VLDY has seen a few of. Customers booking to purely get a neo I think would be in the minimal numbers.
For what it's worth, I've tried the neo, and will now avoid it - the seat is too tight for my liking - 789 and 35k for me.
ashs350K wrote:After reading many many posts on multiple forums I am fully convinced VS know what they’re doing here; bait and switch. It’s very easy for them to see bookings in UC go down where aircraft type is 333 or 787. So they maximise using 339 and 351 as placeholder on routes where they operate these. Overpromise under deliver.
RLF wrote:Looks like GEM is the first 330 to leave the fleet, flew out yesterday
What happens to her next I wonder?
LREDI wrote:789s remain a key part of the fleet - especially given they own a couple and the remainder are on sale and leasebacks...
NEW will be due to head off for overhaul soon, I'd expect a new upper and Premium cabin to be fitted and new covers in Y.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Lukecouchman, Snora and 21 guests