This is the main V-Flyer Forum for general discussion of everything related to flying with Virgin-branded travel companies.
#144033 by McCoy
19 Oct 2006, 15:44
Umm.. nope, don't see a mistake.

[}:)]
#144034 by jamie
19 Oct 2006, 15:45
Someone will..
#144035 by GrahamN
19 Oct 2006, 15:50
..is it you cant discriminate against age?

G.
#144036 by jamie
19 Oct 2006, 15:53
I think so.. It says "To work with us, you'll also need to be well educated, hold an EU passport, stand at least 5'2" in height and be aged 18 "

Obviously this is a mistake but it implies you cannot be over or under 18
#144037 by McCoy
19 Oct 2006, 15:59
..now that's an airline I'd fly with regularly...
#144038 by preiffer
19 Oct 2006, 16:04
Indeed. Mistake?

What's the problem? [:w]
#144042 by Airbus340
19 Oct 2006, 16:58
They lowered it a few weeks ago from 19 i think it said exactly the same in the min requirements but they just lowered the min age.
#144043 by andrew.m.wright
19 Oct 2006, 17:36
Originally posted by GrahamN
..is it you cant discriminate against age?

G.


Yep that's the basis of the new employment law that became law last week ..
#144047 by ShropshireLad
19 Oct 2006, 18:38
Originally posted by andrew.m.wright
Originally posted by GrahamN
..is it you cant discriminate against age?

G.


Yep that's the basis of the new employment law that became law last week ..




Indeed. It's fair enough to impose a lower age of 18 because of a stack of good reasons. For instance, you're not being able to sell alcohol if you're under age 18, and more importantly, most countries require by law that cabin crew have to be at least 18 on safety grounds.

But the lower limit of 19 is basically arbitrary - a 19 year old isn't going to be magically better at anything that someone who's 18 - and so because you can't "objectively justify" the policy, keeping it would have been a breach of the Age Discrimination Regulations. Hence VS have dropped into line.

As an HR lawyer, I can confidently say the new law is a hideous, badly thought-out mess, and an absolute nightmare to help clients implement[:(].

Anyway - can't imagine the change having that much effect in practice. If I were you McCoy, I shouldn't be holding my breath for an airline crewed entirely by nubile 18-year-olds any time soon.
#144049 by McCoy
19 Oct 2006, 18:47
Originally posted by ShropshireLad
If I were you McCoy, I shouldn't be holding my breath for an airline crewed entirely by nubile 18-year-olds any time soon.
Perhaps not... but what a fantastic idea for an adult movie! ;)
#144064 by RichardMannion
19 Oct 2006, 21:09
Originally posted by GrinningJackanapes
You lot should be US Congressmen...

GJ


Gj, you're a smart chap, maybe you can clarify this for me...

Is it true that Senator is Latin for Scandal? :)

Thanks,
Richard
#144066 by slinky09
19 Oct 2006, 21:13
Originally posted by preiffer
Indeed. Mistake?

What's the problem? [:w]


Touche!
#144078 by mysteryflyer
19 Oct 2006, 22:50
I shouldn't be holding my breath for an airline crewed entirely by nubile 18-year-olds any time soon.

I believe it was called hooters air.... but they went "bust"


Boom Boom..
#144111 by catsilversword
20 Oct 2006, 09:13
I read it as applicants should be 18 - not at least 18! Regardless of the new age laws, a bit restriciting, I'd have thought :D
#144169 by candyman
20 Oct 2006, 12:41
the fc all aged 18 it sounds like one of those carling averts that start

carling dont do flights but if they did .......

well at least i think it was carling
#144198 by FlyCC
20 Oct 2006, 15:04
I'm glad VS has lowered the age, even if they were forced to!

I don't see any difference in 18 or 19 year olds, just a number really. If they have our 'Flair', theyÕre willing to work hard, know how to have fun and have successfully completed training then I'd certainly be willing to work with them!
#144225 by mcuth
20 Oct 2006, 16:02
Originally posted by candyman
the fc all aged 18 it sounds like one of those carling averts that start

carling dont do flights but if they did .......

well at least i think it was carling


That'll be Carlsberg & the "Probably...." ads :)

Cheers

Michael
#144313 by candyman
20 Oct 2006, 23:34
i guess you can tell im a none drinker from that sorry

steve
Virgin Atlantic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 161 guests

Itinerary Calendar