Originally posted by ChuckC
Not at all, Paul. You didn't imply that. What I was trying to say was that we Americans don't always have a lot of depth when it comes to remembering those who sacrified for us.
Chuck-
Chuck - I'm going way OT - sorry - but I have a view on this (as a British serviceman), and I think the general feeling among my colleagues is quite the opposite: When it comes to depth, your nation leaves us struggling in your wake given (among other things) US education and medical programmes for veterans. The general goodwill accorded to the armed forces by the public in America, notwithstanding a conflict that can certainly be described as controversial, is also quite stark to those of us who travel in your country.
At a time when we are losing servicemen in Iraq and Afghanistan - four more today - we genuinely appreciate the support that we see from the British public for the commemorative events marking Armistice Day. The people we are losing now are our friends and colleagues, and we feel an affinity with those who went before us, as well. But after the best part of thirty year's uniformed service, there remains for me an element of truth in Kipling's poem,
Tommy.Armistice Day is extremely poignant for most servicemen and, I'm pleased to say, for many others, as well. And I like the rather understated (typically British?) approach we take to it. But that is not the end of the story and, leaving the politics of sending troops to war to one side, your nation is pretty good at its side of the Covenant it enters with those who serve it. I think of the other 364 days in the year and reflect that Armed Forces are for life, not just for Armistice Day.
Best wishes
David