Please use this forum is for Virgin Atlantic trip reports. There is a subforum for other airline reports.
#249620 by mdvipond
06 Jun 2007, 19:59
Ground Staff
Food & Drink
Entertainment
Seat
Cabin Crew
We had as ever a truly fantastic fortnight in Barbados, staying on the West Coast at the dear old Treasure Beach Hotel. One of the many new things we learnt this holiday was that mdvipond jr. dislikes walking barefoot on either grass or sand. This worked a treat in terms of stopping her from straying off the terrace of our suite, but it got a little tiring having to carry her up and down the beach every day. When I finally sat her down on said beach she would hold her ankles in the air to ensure her feet made no contact whatsoever with the sand, smiling fondly in return to the quizzical glances her odd behaviour aroused.

She also took great pleasure in feeding the birds each day, and excelled in helping out the hotel gardeners in tending to the plants in the grounds. And so, as our two weeks of R & R came to a close, we prepared to bid a sad farewell to idyllic Paynes Bay, to the now morbidly obese local bird life and to the indigenous flora which will barley have enough time to recover before our return next year, and reluctantly allowed our thoughts to turn to our trip home.

Having a departure time of 19:40 was pretty good, meaning that we had the best part of a full day on the beach, and the hotel had been kind enough to let us keep our suite on until we had to leave, with our car booked for about 5 o clock. I was intent on making the most of this last day, and attempted to squeeze each of my favourite holiday elements into the final eight hours: breakfast on the terrace, carry mdvipond jr. up the beach, swim with jr. in pool, ditto in the sea, hand jr. onto Mrs. mdvipond (What do you mean wheres her hat? In the sea, I think, no time to go back for it now!), snorkel the reef, lunch by the pool (ordered soup, no time for chewing!) drink a Banks and smoke a cig whilst reading a chapter of my book on the beach, say No thanks to the guy selling carved humming birds (and other sundry items), then stare wistfully at that blue, blue Caribbean Sea before heading forlornly back to the suite, wiping a bitter-sweet tear from my tan, sandy cheek

Wed considered trying online check-in again, but felt that this might prove to be something of a foolhardy endeavour after our experience on the outbound trip, so consoled ourselves by ensuring our requested seats were still showing on the website. They were; 7A & K, as our beloved row 6 had been snapped up by some beavers even more eager than ourselves (bearing in mind wed booked back in August). Damn their hides. I would make it my mission to give them a particularly hard stare when we boarded.

The car arrived on time, well, more a minibus than a car, which was deemed necessary thanks to our profusion of weighty luggage and the unruly hang-glider, now supplemented by a few kilos of rocks, shells and coral collected off the beach, at Mrs. mdviponds insistence, for jr. The journey to the airport was marred only by our drivers obvious fondness for the Alexander ONeil/Luther Vandross school of music where the singers lurrrve their sexy laydees up and want to light candles and take baths with them and stuff which was playing incessantly on CD (most likely from some Lurrrve Your Laydee Up box set collection that isnt available in the shops). Dreadful. Fortunately, the traffic was light and we only had to put up with half an hour of hearing of how the singer wanted to towel his womans body down and sprinkle it with hundreds-and-thousands before we were pulling up at BGI.

With a distinct absence of Red Caps (I think they all took one look at our luggage and hid) we were left with no choice but to manhandle our cases, mdvipond jr. and the unruly hang-glider toward check-in ourselves, until a kindly fella from behind the VS desk dashed out to help us, bless his poly-cotton-mix socks. There was no queue at all and check-in was swift and efficient with the agent confirming that all was good in the world and we still had 7A & K (no chance on row 6, though we did ask).

Then the first bit of bad news there was a delay; only about an hour and a half though and we were informed that we should be departing about 9 o clock. Not a major problem for Mrs. mdvipond and I, but not ideal for jr., as perhaps a tad foolishly we hadnt packed any food for her in our hand luggage. Wed assumed that wed be on the plane at more or less around her dinner time and could feed her then. I know; school-boy error, but what can you do? Not to be down-heartened about such things, we made our way from check-in to the luxurious and hedonistic surroundings of the Club Caribbean Lounge and its famed selection of cheese (Cheddar), biscuits and for some reason a large bowl of spicy tuna mayo. Its basic, but it has a bar and keeps one away from the crowds.

The plan was to enquire in the lounge as to where we could get a snack (other than spicy tuna mayo) for mdvipond jr., and we were rather shocked to be told by the lady on reception that we could, by all means, buy food in the airport, but that we couldnt bring it back into the lounge. You can feed her outside, we were informed. Perhaps spotting the look of incredulity on Mrs. mdviponds face, she added, there are plastic chairs, as if this was going to somehow make the prospect all the more acceptable and appealing. We decided that now wasnt the time for starting a ding-dong (or even its close relations, the kerfuffle or the hoo-har), that would come later. Mrs. mdvipond, therefore, dutifully took jr. out of the lounge to indulge her hunter/gatherer instincts and I made a mental note to e-mail VS on our return.

The ladies in my life returned only a matter of minutes later, with Mrs. mdvipond looking, to say the very least, most dischuffed ('seething' would be a better description). It transpired that buying food in the airport actually meant having to go airside, through security, with no way of getting back through to the lounge. Mrs. mdvipond had enquired of the VS staff landside whether they could help in laying their hands on some fruit or, at the very least, if someone could go through security for us and bring back a sandwich or suchlike (which we would, of course, happily pay for). Their reply? No. You want to feed your daughter, you sort it out yourself. Charming.

On hearing this news, rather than following my instinct and going down to check-in to bang one or two heads together, I realised that the priority was to sort mdvipond jr. with some food before she got cranky and started to upset our fellow lounge dwellers. And if she got upset now, it certainly wasnt going to bode well for the flight itself. I remembered passing a Shell petrol station on our way into the airport, so I hot-footed it outside narrowly avoiding getting knocked down by a couple of taxis and a bus on my way and returned with some ham, biscuits and a muffin for jr. (you try finding anything more nourishing in a petrol station!). Mrs. mdvipond was by this time in full hoo-har mode, on the phone to a lady in the VS office within BGI, being told that if our daughter was as hungry as we were alleging then we should take her airside and stop wasting everyones time by complaining.

After admitting defeat and taking the lady-in-questions name (and she was rather reluctant to give it, for some reason) I proudly presented the Mrs. with my hoard. Well, I better take her outside so she can eat something then, she said. Hold your proverbial horses, quoth I. No way, Jos_. That aint going to happen. After what wed been through and considering how much of our hard-earned was being spent on this flight, mdvipond jr. (who, lest we forget, was an UC pax too) was going to enjoy her ham/biscuit/muffin combo in the bland, yet relatively pleasant surroundings of the Club Caribbean Lounge and if any of the staff within the afore mentioned lounge wanted to grapple the food out of the hands of my 20 month old daughter, they were welcome to try. Hell, Id even get my camera out and take a few photos of the moment for posterity. They (most wisely) didnt, and jr. merrily tucked into her impromptu picnic with the exceptionally kind addition of an apple from a fellow passenger who admitted, with fretful glances over her shoulder, that shed been too scared to give it to her earlier with the staff watching.

With that little melodrama behind us and mdvipond jr.s appetite temporarily sated, we had time for a quiet G & T and a chat with some of the folk in the lounge who, without exception, had been very kind and supportive throughout. One particular couple who travel to their villa on Sandy Lane estate five or six times a year (take that, bottle-blonde and the Bragathon entrants {see previous TR}) claimed that they were hardly surprised with our treatment as, in their opinion, Virgin are crap and they seldom have a flight without something going wrong. And these guys were Flying Club Gold. Yikes.

Wed been informed that we should be boarding at about 8 o clock, and confirmed this in the affirmative with the lounge receptionist who was wait for it eating a pre-packaged sandwich! Being in no mood for any further aggravation, and with it fast approaching ten to the hour, we departed the lounge safe in the knowledge wed left enough time for security and picking up our duty free.

Security was a breeze (although I found it disconcerting that I got through with a cigarette lighter and a bottle of water), our duty free was dutifully collected and we headed for our gate which without a number showing on our boarding card we assumed to be the one with a couple of hundred Economy and Premium pax sleeping around it. Great. We checked at the gate itself to find out what was happening and were told that an announcement should be made at half past eight. So why, on Gods clean earth, wasnt I still ensconced in the lounge quaffing gin and gorging myself on spicy tuna mayo?! After a quick word with Mr. & Mrs. VS are crap, who were the last out of the lounge and had just joined our not-so-merry UC throng, it transpired that the staff who had told them the flight was boarding had been chomping strenuously at the bit to go home and put their feet up for the night. They were actually turning the lights out whilst Mr. & Mrs. VSaC were collecting their bags to leave!

And so our little band of UC refugees waited, relatively patiently, at the Priority Boarding sign. Half past the hour came and went, and still nothing. Then, at long last, an announcement: Passengers are reminded that they may take only one piece of hand luggage onto the aircraft and that this must be stowed in the overhead lockers or under the seat in front of them. That was it? That was our fabled announcement?? I was beaten by Mr. VSaC by little more than a head to the nearest member of staff who was, it appeared, about to experience one heck of a kerfuffle. He didnt last long, and quickly informed us that he would commence priority boarding. This was seen as a green light to the Y and W pax who, to be quite fair, had been hanging around a hot and humid terminal for over three hours, and a charge for the gate ensued. Fortunately we and Mr. & Mrs. VSaC were at the very front of this melee and the member of staff had the good sense to see what was coming and hurriedly opened the doors.

We high tailed it across the tarmac and into the open arms of Hot Lips (if youll excuse the mixed metaphor) at a little after 9 o clock. Quickly finding our seats and stowing our luggage, we were settled and awaiting our champagne which, under the circumstances, took much longer than it should to be delivered. There was also an FAs red jacket cast over the back of Mrs. mdviponds seat, which we decided to leave to see how long it would take for its owner to retrieve it. After ten minutes or so it was still laying there unclaimed, so I took it to the FA at the bar. Thank you sir, she said breezily. Could I have your boarding card, then Ill be able to give you your jacket back when we land. Good grief, I may be no GrinningJackanapes, but Im not so sartorially ignorant as to be seen sporting a bright red polyester jacket!

I believe, I said, surprising myself by the ease with which my face formed the most patronising of smiles, that this belongs to you. The FA blushed a colour somewhere close to the jacket in question, thanked me and I returned, wearily, to my seat.

After so much activity, take-off and drinks orders were something of a blur, but by the time the seat belt signs were off I found a Tanqueray 10 and tonic on my cocktail shelf and jr. asleep on Mrs. mdviponds lap. I took a deep swig of my drink and, finally, started to relax. The menu looked rather good and I opted for the carrot and ginger soup and saut_ed chicken breast with basil rice and some sort of teriyaki sauce. Mrs. went for the soup and grilled tenderloin on garlic mash.

Whilst we waited for dinner I noticed that the FSM was starting to move among us. He first approached the couple in 6A & K you know, the ones who stole our seats and seemed to be deeply apologetic and regretful about something or other. Rather amusingly, the lady in 6A had accidentally started to turn her suite into a bed at some point, and then pushed it back manually, meaning that her seat back was still leaning ever-so-slightly forward. I think it was the couples first time in UC and I from the look on her face Im guessing she was expecting the seats to be just a tad more comfortable.

Once the FSM reached us he was, once again, deeply apologetic and regretful firstly for the delay and secondly and this seemed to hurt him more than words alone could say because theyd forgotten to load any snooze-packs-in-a-bag. For this we were offered compensation of duty free (never found out how much) or miles 5K each. Opted for the miles, and requested an economy amenity pack for the sake, at the very least, of a toothbrush. Plastic Y packs were quickly distributed, much to Mrs. VSaCs disgust, who had also decided by now that her sleep suit smelt funny (I probably hadnt helped matters by telling her that sleep suits are laundered rather than - as she'd previously believed - replaced for each flight, a fact which seemed to unsettle her considerably).

Dinner arrived, and my soup and chicken were excellent, leaving me too full to contemplate cheese or a desert. Movie wise, I watched Stranger Than Fiction, where straight-laced taxman Will Ferrell suddenly realises his every move is being narrated by a female voice in his head. Emma Thompsons voice, to be precise, which I would personally find unnerving at the best of times. Really good film actually, clever and funny in equal measure. Mrs. mdviponds grilled tenderloin actually metamorphosed at some stage into what I vaguely recognised from previous flights as VSs take on beef bourguignon. Bored of complaining, and seeing very little point in doing so, the Mrs. tucked in and enjoyed it very much.

The cabin lights were dimmed and the majority of folk bedded down. I didnt feel up for a kip at that point so grabbed another glass of wine, stuck the QC2s and the Ipod on, and chilled to some Charlie Parker. After half and hour or so I felt myself drifting so flipped the suite to a bed, eschewing the sleep suit and choosing to lay on rather than under the duvet. Ive found this a decent way to combat the (alleged) habit of VS crew on night flights to turn the cabin temperature up to level previously only experienced by the inmates of the prison camp in Bridge Over The River Kwai in an attempt to lull us into a fitful sleep. Actually, it wasnt too bad on this flight and I was soon away with the fairies or, to be more precise, jamming live on stage with Charlie Parker in an LA nightclub circa 1953. And I was smoking...

Mrs. mdvipond woke me some four hours later, with little more than an hour left to landing. Four solid hours is pretty good by anyones standards, and I was pleased to discover that mdvipond jr. had kept her end up and was still dozing in 7A. Wed decided, as ever, to skip breakfast; theres something particularly unappealing about trying to eat cereal and bacon sarnies when youre still burping wine, and carrot and ginger soup. As far as my body was concerned it was also only 4 in the morning, which is in this reviewers humble opinion an entirely uncivilised hour to do solids. So, we washed up, packed up and descended through broken cloud toward MAN. We landed about an hour behind schedule, but then had another half hour to wait to get onto a stand, which was tiresome.

Once we were on stand we disembarked pretty sharpish, with only PE allowed off ahead of UC for obvious logistical reasons, and went effortlessly through immigration. At baggage re-claim, the unruly hang-glider was first off, probably having elbowed and bullied its way to the front of the queue, closely followed by the rest of the luggage.

Passing through the Nothing to Declare channel, and trying our best to avoid the incidence of another luggaglanche, we were inexplicably joined by a bouncy Caribbean lady, clearly travelling alone and not dissimilar to the great Rusty Lee. Hi, she hollered, that was a great flight wasnt it?. Before I could deliver a quick pr_cis of my forthcoming trip report, a customs officer suddenly appeared a bit like the fancy-dress-shop-owner in Mr. Ben and politely enquired of the lady where she was travelling from. We kept moving without looking back for fear of being implicated in whatever fiendish smuggling scam she was involved in and soon spied Senior Pond waiting in arrivals for us.

Of course, this being MAN, we were only an hour or so from home, which was a particularly refreshing change from the interminable two to three hours wed normally be experiencing waiting for our connecting flight at LGW.

So, a mixed old bag. Not good at all how things were handled either on the mdvipond/food front, or in terms of the lounge turfing everyone out an hour before the flight boarded just because the staff were missing American Idol (or whatever). A strongly worded e-mail is on its way to Branson Towers. The FAs were a bit wet, but a lot better than some weve had on the return leg from B&S destinations. It wasnt the FSMs fault that there no amenity packs on the flight, and he handled things marvellously by apologising quite as contritely as he did and doling out a few compensatory miles. The food was great and the four hours kip a real bonus.

Next up for the Family mdvipond? Well, VS wise, its HKG and SYD in December (so long to wait!), with jr., who will have turned two by then, getting her own suite for the first time. Spoilt little tyke. Maybe we should buy her a Y seat instead and hope that someone down the back adopts her for 12 hours or so. Any offers, please feel free to contact me.
#408886 by Stevieboy
06 Jun 2007, 20:34
Fantastic TR![oo][oo]
I cannot believe the food saga in the Lounge. It's things like this that really let VS down. Why can't these people just use common sense!

-Steve
#408889 by NS
06 Jun 2007, 20:39
Great TR - Thank you

I agree, some lounges are a total let down, notably those in B&S destinations...and then there's the LHR Clubhouse. Another VS inconsistency
#408891 by Tippetttowers
06 Jun 2007, 20:52
I agree with stevieboy, surely anyone with an ounce of common sense would turn a blind eye, i must admit before i had my dear little sprog all i thought about was what alcohol fix i could get before i boarded, but seeing a hungry baby isn't a pleasant sight. Let us know what reply you get from VS!
#408912 by pjh
07 Jun 2007, 09:38
Thanks a lot, another excellent read. You make even the most trying of circumstances (I don't like the sound of 'cereal and bacon sarnies') sound like a real adventure.

Paul
#408914 by Nevil30
07 Jun 2007, 10:02
Great trip report as ever [y].

Real shame about the lounge, there is nothing worse than been stuck without food for Jr and for the lounge staff to say that she couldn't eat in there is nuts! [V]
#408918 by MarkJ
07 Jun 2007, 10:15
Another enjoyable read - what the hell were they doing at BGI? Madness!![V]
#408922 by Neil
07 Jun 2007, 11:11
Thanks for another excellent TR - sorry to hear of your troubles at BGI, you can just about understand, but not condone the lounge staff not giving a damn as they are not VS employee's but the attitude shown by the VS ground staff was unacceptable and something VS need to address.

Neil
#408939 by mdvipond
07 Jun 2007, 15:43
Originally posted by Attitude23
Thanks for another excellent TR - sorry to hear of your troubles at BGI, you can just about understand, but not condone the lounge staff not giving a damn as they are not VS employee's but the attitude shown by the VS ground staff was unacceptable and something VS need to address.

Neil

Glad you like the TR.

I have to admit, as I was proof reading through before posting it last night, I actually found myself getting even angrier than I probably was at the time. The whole lounge fiasco (both the food-jr. thing and being turfed out well before the flight was boarding) was a farce and, as you say, whilst the lounge staffs' attitude was pretty shabby the way the VS staff acted really does put the name of the airline to shame.

I'm sending my letter of complaint to VS today, and have specifically asked for an explanation as to how things went so dreadfully wrong as well as what they intend to do about it. Watch this space, I guess...
#408948 by iforres1
07 Jun 2007, 17:03
Another excellent TR[y]

I can so much relate to everything that you experience with jnr and I found myself nodding at all the antics. I can't believe the attitude of the VS groundstaff at BGI and your letter to VS is completely justified.

Just out of interest what did you make of the new terminal and duty free shops?

Iain
#408954 by mdvipond
07 Jun 2007, 17:48
Originally posted by iforres1
Another excellent TR[y]

I can so much relate to everything that you experience with jnr and I found myself nodding at all the antics. I can't believe the attitude of the VS groundstaff at BGI and your letter to VS is completely justified.

Just out of interest what did you make of the new terminal and duty free shops?

Iain

The new terminal is OK, but nothing to write home about (although it's leagues ahead of other Caribbean airports we've been to!). The duty free shops looked adequate, but we'd bought all of our booze 'n' fags earlier in the holiday, meaning that we just needed to pick them up airside before boarding the flight. All parcelled up in a lovely box, they were. Very handy.
#408987 by mediamonkey
07 Jun 2007, 22:28
just want to say how much I enjoyed this TR. A super read.
#409000 by honey lamb
08 Jun 2007, 00:01
I've been cudgelling my brain cell to decide what to post. If I say 'excellent trip report' some less familiar with the writings of mdvipond might think that the word 'excellent' referred to the trip itself rather than the details of the report in which the words 'dismal' and 'service' neatly juxtaposed come to mind [:0] Therefore let me say how much I enjoyed the report of the flight together with the details of the shennanigans of the staff in the lounge. It is always so much more comforting when it happens to other people [:w]

I was totally fascinated by Mr and Mrs VSaC's continued 'loyalty' to VS. Was it because, in the words of Baroness Thatcher in reference to this green isle of mine, TINA (which has been subsequently proved wrong [y] ) or because they chose not to route via London and the delights of the dark side? Perhaps their alternative name is Mr and Mrs BAaCer [:?]
#409012 by n/a
08 Jun 2007, 03:06
Holy sh*t -- I got name-checked in an mdvipond TR!!! Chuffed doesn't even begin to define how I feel right now...thank you, sir.

A few thoughts:

* Because it involved your child, I am certain you see this from a different perspective than me, but, all things being equal, I can understand why the desk staff would not go to fetch food for your baby. I am sure this was not the answer you wanted, but if I had had to wait on line because one of the staff had gone to do a food run for someone, I may have not been charitable. This is difficult to type because you are obviously a smart and clever fellow. But I must be honest...

* OTOH...the idiocy of the CH staff cannot be underestimated. Sure, they probably don't want excess food wrappers and other detritus collecting about the CH, but this is a child eating a little muffin and a slice of ham. And not to forget the thousands of quid you were paying. I'm not a big fan of the whole 'But it's my kid so I'm sure the rules can be broken for him/her' attitude, but in this case who the hell was it hurting? Jobsworthian miscarriage of justice, this.

* On the matter of the jacket, I am afraid, sir, you give me over to blush. You see...[:I]...erm...well...I have a red jacket -- a stunning Missoni wool, cherokee in colour, hardly the hideous stuff of an unnatural fabric, but when you said that I was alternately proud and pummelled by self-doubt. I shall refrain from wearing it until I've had a good long think about whether it may just be that one step beyond the pale! [:p] Thank you for the chance to re-evaluate my sartorial situation.

* Emma Thompson is a hot woman. I nearly went straight watching Howard's End, you know. (God, that was an awful pun...)

* Chipper people in baggage claim are either: 1) mad, 2) madder or 3) out to steal your luggage/beg a ride into town/otherwise unalluring. Good of you to avoid them.

Now...the real issue I need to discuss. How in the living daylights does one pronounce your name?

Is it Mid-Vippond? Em-Dee-Vee-Pond? Or, like some White Russian noble, does one not pronounce the 'md' at all and go straight on to just 'Vipond?' And is that Vee-pond or Vippund...

Oh my...

Anyway, lovely TR. You set the bar, sir, whilst I merely drink at it. I wish you flew more. [y]

Cheers (and please don't think me an arse for my first point about food runs...).

GJ
#409015 by ukcobra
08 Jun 2007, 03:21
Cracking read, interested to hear about VS's response to your food/CH issue.

I'm still waiting on a food related in-flight complaint (PE) from early May......
#409023 by mdvipond
08 Jun 2007, 12:01
Originally posted by honey lamb

I was totally fascinated by Mr and Mrs VSaC's continued 'loyalty' to VS. Was it because, in the words of Baroness Thatcher in reference to this green isle of mine, TINA (which has been subsequently proved wrong ) or because they chose not to route via London and the delights of the dark side?

Hello honey lamb. Glad you liked the TR. From chatting to Mr. & Mrs. VSaC I think they live about half and hour from MAN, which is bound to be a pretty big deciding factor. Plus, I got the feeling they rather enjoyed complaining...

Originally posted by Grinning Jackanapes

Because it involved your child, I am certain you see this from a different perspective than me, but, all things being equal, I can understand why the desk staff would not go to fetch food for your baby. I am sure this was not the answer you wanted, but if I had had to wait on line because one of the staff had gone to do a food run for someone, I may have not been charitable. This is difficult to type because you are obviously a smart and clever fellow. But I must be honest...

GJ - your honesty is a credit to you. And you have a fair point. If some flustered 'mumsy' type was bothering the desk staff whilst I was trying to check-in, I would have been most miffed. But rest assured, stout fellow, we wouldn't do that. We travelled an awful lot before the advent of mdvipond jr. and would be the first ones to cast disapproving scowls the minute an ankle-biter even passed a CH. However, this has stood us in good stead, as we are now exceptionally careful in not allowing the presence of jr. to affect any other travellers' relaxation or enjoyment.

Long story short, the MAN flight was the last of the day, all pax had been checked-in, and the desk staff were doing very little else other than 'milling' (and with that description I am being quite generous). It wasn't that we were demanding that they go airside forthwith and forage for food for our child - we'd got stuck with a delay we hadn't expected and we just wanted a bit of help. If, for instance, they could have just arranged for Mrs. mdvipond to be let through security to buy food and then come back landside, it would have helped. But, alas, our requests came to nought which, considering the class we were flying, wasn't what we'd hoped for.

Originally posted by Grinning Jackanapes

OTOH...the idiocy of the CH staff cannot be underestimated. Sure, they probably don't want excess food wrappers and other detritus collecting about the CH, but this is a child eating a little muffin and a slice of ham. And not to forget the thousands of quid you were paying. I'm not a big fan of the whole 'But it's my kid so I'm sure the rules can be broken for him/her' attitude, but in this case who the hell was it hurting? Jobsworthian miscarriage of justice, this.

And, lest we forget, the lounge receptionist was eating a pre-packaged sarnie herself...

Originally posted by Grinning Jackanapes

On the matter of the jacket, I am afraid, sir, you give me over to blush. You see......erm...well...I have a red jacket -- a stunning Missoni wool, cherokee in colour

'Cherokee' is a colour???

Originally posted by GRinning Jackanapes

Emma Thompson is a hot woman. I nearly went straight watching Howard's End, you know. (God, that was an awful pun...)

Ah yes, GJ, but aren't you the man who also believes that Tracey Emin is 'brilliant and talented'...?

And you were terribly close on the name; 'md' are my initials and Vipond is pronounced vy-(rhymes with 'sky')-pond. Derived from the Old French for 'old bridge' or 'vieux pont'.

Glad you enjoyed the TR. You, sir? An arse, sir? No sir...
#409033 by n/a
08 Jun 2007, 17:23
Sir, your kind provision of additional context supplies me with a foundation ample enough to be swayed to your side as concerns the matter of helping you to get food for jr. at check-in. In retrospect, I now sod them all.

'Cherokee red' was Frank Lloyd Wright's signature colour, which is what led me to buy the jacket as I am a fan and collector of his works (though sadly, as yet, not one of his houses).

As regards Miss Emin, I always base my opinions of an artist's work on my own subjective impressions. And yet, the Royal Academy has just named her an RA, the Venice Bienalle committee chose her, the Turner Prize shortlisted her, collectors with far deeper insight and understanding of art history's whorls and eddies buy her...in short, I would like her if none of that had happened, but it has, and I thus take comfort in elite company.

Thanks again for your considered response -- and if we all chip in to buy you a UC trip soon, would you repay us by writing a TR? [:p]

GJ
#409076 by mdvipond
09 Jun 2007, 11:36
Originally posted by Grinning Jackanapes

In retrospect, I now sod them all.

That's the spirit! Are you sure you're not from Yorkshire?

I'll leave you be in your appreciation - nay, adoration - of Miss Emin (although she strikes me more as the Ms. type).

Originally posted by Grinning Jackanapes

if we all chip in to buy you a UC trip soon, would you repay us by writing a TR?

Yes! Yes! Yes! (in the stlye of Meg Ryan in that deli).
#409177 by buns
10 Jun 2007, 09:08
Mdvipond

The word 'excellent' comes to mind when reading your TR.

Not, as you understand, in realtion to the service you received, but your writing which had me fully enagaged.

I do hope that VS come up trumps with their response (I very much doubt it though[:#]) as this will ensure future TRs for us all to delight in


buns
#409228 by Mrs Buns
10 Jun 2007, 18:37
Another excellent read!! Didn't realise I would get to read the return TR so soon! Buns pointed out the error of my ways.

It was a shame that the trip home was not a smooth running as you had hoped - at least there were some good parts to the flight despite the kerfuffle with Jr. Be interested to see what sort of response you see from VA.

Mrs Buns
#409370 by mdvipond
11 Jun 2007, 12:24
Thanks again, you kind Bunses you.

Letter of complaint went off to Branson Towers last week. Like you, I'm expecting very little back, but I will insist on a reponse/explanation of some sort. And a few miles wouldn't hurt...
#409478 by Decker
11 Jun 2007, 21:38
:) Again another excellent TR - thank you.
#410401 by mdvipond
21 Jun 2007, 11:24
For anyone interested in the response to my letter of complaint - you really should get out more.

The good news? Had quite a quick turnaround and received a reply from Customer Relations today (I originally wrote to Branson's office, but my letter had clearly been passed back down to the lower ranks).

The not-so-good-but-hardly-surprising news? They've not really addressed any of my concerns:

- Delays happen, we're really sorry about that (I never had a problem with the delay)
- Security procedures are set by the airport so our staff couldn't authorise you to go airside for food and come back (fine, but did they have to be so rude, dismissive and unhelpful about it?)

And my favourite - 'Our staff worked really hard to give a quick turnaround and I believe that our staff asked passengers to leave the lounge and go through security to make sure that boarding was processed quickly and effeciently.' Bollocks. The staff asked us to leave the lounge 'cause they wanted to go home. When we got to the gate the cleaners were just going on the plane. Leaving UC pax stood at the gate for an hour is NOT making sure that boarding was processed quickly and effeciently. Quite the opposite in fact.

Not happy. Probably banging may head against a pebble-dashed wall here, but I'm sending off a reply today to demand a few more answers.
#410406 by mike-smashing
21 Jun 2007, 11:57
Originally posted by mdvipond
For anyone interested in the response to my letter of complaint - you really should get out more.


I will. At the weekend.

The not-so-good-but-hardly-surprising news? They've not really addressed any of my concerns:

And my favourite - 'Our staff worked really hard to give a quick turnaround and I believe that our staff asked passengers to leave the lounge and go through security to make sure that boarding was processed quickly and effeciently.' Bollocks. The staff asked us to leave the lounge 'cause they wanted to go home.


Didn't they even send you a mileage bribe to sod off and leave them alone?

There's more spin there than Alastair Campbell on a roundabout.

Mike
#410410 by mdvipond
21 Jun 2007, 12:29
Originally posted by mike-smashing

Didn't they even send you a mileage bribe to sod off and leave them alone?


Well, of course they did. A glittering 10K each. We are truly honoured...
Virgin Atlantic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Itinerary Calendar