This is the main V-Flyer Forum for general discussion of everything related to flying with Virgin-branded travel companies.
#440125 by preiffer
07 Apr 2008, 12:40
NOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooooooo!!!! [n][n][n]
#440126 by Pete
07 Apr 2008, 12:43
Paul, is that Nooo... to VS not allowing voice calls, or Nooo... to Ryanair, et al, giving it the thumbs up?
#440127 by preiffer
07 Apr 2008, 12:53
RyanAir can do what they like - I'm not stepping foot on one of those tin cans... [;)]

It's the words 'FOR NOW' that worries the hell out of me in terms of VS. This IS the start of a very heavy rolling ball from my perspective - one that's only going downhill.


What I would say though, is that my 'loyalty' WILL switch to whichever carrier offers this LAST in the industry. [n]
#440132 by Pete
07 Apr 2008, 14:09
Originally posted by preiffer

What I would say though, is that my 'loyalty' WILL switch to whichever carrier offers this LAST in the industry. [n]


I tend to agree. Pampering in the Clubhouse is one thing. The thought of having to sit in the same confined space with someone speaking loudly into their mobile phone is enough reason not to travel. It's bad enough on the train from Paddington to Reading, and that's only 35 minutes...
#440152 by Treelo
07 Apr 2008, 18:11
Originally posted by preiffer


What I would say though, is that my 'loyalty' WILL switch to whichever carrier offers this LAST in the industry. [n]


Me, most definitely, too. [^][y]
#440159 by Scrooge
07 Apr 2008, 19:11
A good thing about doing a trans Atlantic...very hard to get service when your over the middle of an ocean.
#440171 by Darren Wheeler
07 Apr 2008, 20:20
Originally posted by Scrooge
A good thing about doing a trans Atlantic...very hard to get service when your over the middle of an ocean.


Not when you have a satellite above you.... [:(!]
#440183 by slinky09
07 Apr 2008, 21:13
Originally posted by preiffer

It's the words 'FOR NOW' that worries the hell out of me in terms of VS. This IS the start of a very heavy rolling ball from my perspective - one that's only going downhill.

What I would say though, is that my 'loyalty' WILL switch to whichever carrier offers this LAST in the industry. [n]



I 100% agree. I've aready stated this about Emirates and the same applies to Virgin Atlantic. By all means run the airline down I say, I won't be on it so I won't care.
#440203 by Scrooge
07 Apr 2008, 22:29
Originally posted by Darren Wheeler
Originally posted by Scrooge
A good thing about doing a trans Atlantic...very hard to get service when your over the middle of an ocean.


Not when you have a satellite above you.... [:(!]


UUmmmm...actually when Mrs S had her work Sat phone it saved my butt..however you are right, it has no place on a plane.
#440244 by mcmbenjamin
08 Apr 2008, 11:40
Originally posted by preiffer
It's the words 'FOR NOW' that worries the hell out of me in terms of VS. This IS the start of a very heavy rolling ball from my perspective - one that's only going downhill.


I do agree Mr. Preiffer BUT recall this July 12, 2000 NY Times article, Business Travel; Oh joyous day! Virgin Atlantic makes it possible for passengers to use cell phones on flights. VS has had the mobile phone usage on board before (granted via the headset). I would think it could be a slippery slope to return, especially as demand could increase due to lower roaming fees.
#440246 by Darren Wheeler
08 Apr 2008, 11:48
I doubt this will be covered by normal roaming fees as there is a satellite in use. Neither OFCOM or the EU have much say in the costings for satellite use.
Virgin Atlantic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 175 guests

Itinerary Calendar