Originally posted by willd
Originally posted by DarkAuror
Ahhh the old 'we dont like director of footballs' argument.
With regards to the situation at Spurs, surely Ramos was aware (and is used to) that he was going to be working with a director of football? Surely on joining he would have wanted to make it 100% what his role would be and how much say he would have in buying players?
As an outsider I dont think the director of football is solely to blame, after all Ramos is the man deciding the tactics. That said certain players at Spurs do not look right for the club.
I don't have a problem with the concept of a Director of Football as it works very well in Spain and Italy. My problem which is what appears to have happen in Newcastle and Spurs is where the DOF and the coach/manager are not singing from the same hymn sheet. The whole point is of the DOF to look for players that the manager fully endorses, try to sign them and to get the best value for players leaving the club. The DOF also takes away the non footballing parts away from the manager leaving him to concentrate on the footballing parts.
So, in Newcastle's case, the whole 1st team squad is up for sale and Wise brings in players without Keegan's knowledge. In Spurs case, Comolli brings in Bentley, Gomes, Modric, Del Santos, Pavylchenko with Ramos's knowledge but he also bring Darren Bent and paid over the odds for him (ok, last season). Comolli then sells Berbatov and Keane for a great piece of business but not replacing them with good players afterwards.
Ramos is used to having a DOF from working in Spain. I think that it's English clubs are not used to working with this structure and how it's suppose to work.
There is only one case of it working properly in England and that's Chelsea.
But I agree with you Will, it doesn't matter what players Ramos has at his disposal, he is responsible for tactics. It doesn't help if he has one hand tied behind his back if he doesn't have a wealth of strikers.