This is the main V-Flyer Forum for general discussion of everything related to flying with Virgin-branded travel companies.
#722655 by Darren Wheeler
11 Aug 2009, 07:00
Excellent news. Obviously done to meet the cruise market.
#722658 by Nottingham Nick
11 Aug 2009, 07:54
BOS - FLL would also be nice, [:I] but it is good to see they are still expanding in these difficult times.

Nick
#722899 by willd
14 Aug 2009, 18:52
Now that was a shock.

All the rumours and industry analysts have all been saying MIA would be the next station for VX.

Of course VX avoids directly any competition with AA by selecting FLL.

As Darren points out, clearly they are aiming for the O&D market rather than the connections market which is MIA's specialism.
#723180 by slinky09
18 Aug 2009, 10:43
quote:Originally posted by Darren Wheeler
Excellent news. Obviously done to meet the cruise market.


I'm sure this is partly the reason, also VX was looking into SFO/LAX-MIA but MIA is apparently a notoriously expensive airport in terms of fees (and a notorious airport too!). FLL shares a lot of the same catchment area to the north of Miami and SFO-FLL is a big pink pound (or dollar) route.

I also saw, over on a.net that Vancouver and Toronto may be routes soon added, see here. Which is more really good news. Down the line, if with the A333s Vancouver is on the VS network, one could easily do LHR-SFO-YVR-LHR, a very nice trip too [y].
#723211 by Darren Wheeler
18 Aug 2009, 14:46
Vancouver makes perfect sense. A short hop after the SEA flight.
Virgin Atlantic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 184 guests

Itinerary Calendar