Originally posted by jetwet1
A very interesting read Chuck,thanks for the link.
A lot of what is said is true,in the US we do need to lose one or two of the majors just to reduce capacity to a more rational level,where every airline can make money.
Dave,
You make the point that many rational folks have been trying to make, ever since Alfred Kahn, deregulation "czar" in the Carter administration, took fare-setting authority away from the government: let the marketplace set its own fares. Updating Kahn's argument: let the marketplace determine how it wants to be flown, and what it's willing to pay for the privilege.
What Kahn and the government failed to foresee (at least I hope they didn't plan for this to happen) is that massive organizations -- particularly those accustomed to having the government as a "boss" -- can't morph into simpler, leaner structures without a commitment by all stakeholders to work together toward a major transformation. Heck, our federal government is a perfect example of how difficult it is to achieve such a feat, if one is even tempted to try.
Not to preach on about this, but IMHO the airlines like Southwest, or even Delta's "Song", or Jet Blue, AirTran and a few others, "get" it only because they had the ability to become very flexible as other, larger carriers tried, and mostly failed, to change their business model. Thus went away vast carriers such as TWA and Pan Am. United is no longer the proud bird it once was; American has done a better job of adapting but is not totally out of the woods.
Time will tell, but DL and NW may not survive. Dave's point will thus be proven.
Regards to all.
Chuck-
Chuck-