This is the main V-Flyer Forum for general discussion of everything related to flying with Virgin-branded travel companies.
#789283 by Stevieboy
25 Aug 2011, 18:25
Does anyone know what the issue is with the toilets at the front of PE on the A333.

I collected some passengers from LGW earlier this week and although they loved the new aircraft they were pretty pee'd off with having to queue for 10-15 minutes to use the toilet as on both the outbound and inbound flights they were not in use.

-Steve
#789290 by twirlygal
25 Aug 2011, 19:06
My Mum and Dad had exactly the same complaint when returning from MCO a couple of weeks ago and had to join the queues for the Economy loos. The crew appeared to want to keep the area a passenger free zone so they could enjoy some uninterrupted quality time.
#789292 by cinnabartoast
25 Aug 2011, 19:45
On VS75/76 we were able to use the front PE toilet all flight...had to wait a little to use it on occasion though. All the cabin crew requested was that if you were waiting, you did so behind the curtain and not in the galley area.
#789293 by Neil
25 Aug 2011, 19:48
It is badly designed and a result it seems some crews make it out of use, whilst others allow it to be used - seems to be a decision made by the crew/captain
#789296 by northernhenry
25 Aug 2011, 21:18
It would seem right that pax start logging complaints officially so it gets a proper review, rather than just grumbling.
The PE experience is sold as a dedicated cabin experience, and having loo's withheld at the whim of the crew doesn't sound right..

Mechanical faults fair enough, because the crew find people get in the way or are bothersome when having 5 for a brew etc...sorry, thats no reason to prevent a newly designed aircraft's facilities being withheld..Especially for a cabin that is "enhanced".
#789335 by diamon4
26 Aug 2011, 15:47
Completely agree with northernhenry. The A333 has apparently has no rest area for the crew. Perhaps this is why this are is being kept separate from the passengers.
#789338 by Treelo
26 Aug 2011, 16:59
Neil: The positioning of the forward toilet on the 333 is no worse than that of those upstairs in PE on the LGW/MAN 747s (ie right outside the cockpit door). :)

NH: Agree - perhaps it is time for some letters to be winging their way to VS HQ - or maybe for some staffers to read these comments and do something about it. ;)

Diamond 4: has the crew on the VS 75 and/or 76 not had 'rest' during their downtime in Orlando? I have no quibble with crew having their meals/coffee/tea breaks just like every other worker but, when I go to work , I don't expect to have a 2 or 3 hour sleep halfway during my working day. v( Or am I being too hard?
#789343 by Neil
26 Aug 2011, 17:39
Treelo wrote:Neil: The positioning of the forward toilet on the 333 is no worse than that of those upstairs in PE on the LGW/MAN 747s (ie right outside the cockpit door). :)


It's worse because from the AC side you to go through and wait in the galley to get to it - and it seems crews are not wanting this for whatever reason and thus making it out of action.

I don't think proximity to the cockpit door / security is an issue.
#789346 by Treelo
26 Aug 2011, 18:09
Neil wrote:
Treelo wrote:Neil: The positioning of the forward toilet on the 333 is no worse than that of those upstairs in PE on the LGW/MAN 747s (ie right outside the cockpit door). :)


I don't think proximity to the cockpit door / security is an issue.


Nor do I mate, but that is precisely the reason I was given for an inability to use that facility on a VS76 back from MCO in May, Perhaps if crews were all singing from the same hymn sheet.............. :(
#789350 by Neil
26 Aug 2011, 18:21
Exactly - some crews allow it, some don't, surely there has to be some sort of official policy from VS?
#789353 by buns
26 Aug 2011, 19:30
Neil wrote:Exactly - some crews allow it, some don't, surely there has to be some sort of official policy from VS?


Could not agree more Neil y) y)

buns
#789355 by Neil
26 Aug 2011, 20:16
buns wrote:
Neil wrote:Exactly - some crews allow it, some don't, surely there has to be some sort of official policy from VS?


Could not agree more Neil y) y)

buns


Let's see what the FB team respond - might give some clarity.
#789356 by Neil
26 Aug 2011, 20:30
Bit of an update on this (not from the FB team).

Seems VS policy is for the toilet to be made available, but for pax to queue on the cabin side of the curtain.

Some captains however are not happy and they instruct it to be blocked as they feel It is a security issue(they have ultimate decision). Whilst on the upper deck of a 747 from the cockpit they can see right down the cabin through the spy hole, on the A330 because of the bulkhead they can't, and some captains not happy with that.

The crew are entitled to a certain amount of rest during the flight to/from MCO (guess it's like a lunch break for anyone else and isn't very long) and the only place to take it is the front jump seats, but that is not the reason for blocking the front toilet.
#789357 by slinky09
26 Aug 2011, 20:40
Well that excuse is pants, I've just got off a CO B737 where, like all 737s and 320s the loo is right by the cockpit door. But, I've been on plenty of 777s where the galley is in the line of sight behind the cockpit door and there's a F or J loo right there too. Queuing behind the curtain when the CC are prepping meals etc. seem reasonable, all else is poor, crew should take this up with VS and get a fix, not inconvenience passengers.
#789366 by Treelo
26 Aug 2011, 21:22
Neil wrote:The crew are entitled to a certain amount of rest during the flight to/from MCO (guess it's like a lunch break for anyone else and isn't very long).


I totally agree with the concept of a lunch-break style 'rest period' Neil, but as I mentioned above, my last flight on the VS76 saw at least 5 crew members bunking down complete with pillows and blankets for a 2 or 3 hour nap. Wonder how my line manager would react if I cleared my desk and stretched out for a couple of hours of zeds after my tuna and celery on wholemeal baguette :o)

Slinky - I concur :)
#789416 by AlecK
27 Aug 2011, 19:29
The crew we had on the A330 at Easter denied the front WC even existed !

On a side note we have just been booted out of row 25 in PE as it's apparently now been decided this is allocation at airport only. Phoned up to enquire why and ended up in UC the day before thanks to sale fares :)
#789424 by AlecK
27 Aug 2011, 20:28
Just got a reply on FB about row 25 - the lunatics are definately running the VS asylum. They are trialling a new policy to keep some seats back (rows 18 & 25 ACHK) so they can seat families together at checkm in if they have problems , and in doing so split my family up all over the cabin.
#789629 by Bill S
29 Aug 2011, 20:49
AlecK wrote:The crew we had on the A330 at Easter denied the front WC even existed !

On a side note we have just been booted out of row 25 in PE as it's apparently now been decided this is allocation at airport only. Phoned up to enquire why and ended up in UC the day before thanks to sale fares :)

Many Thanks for that info. Alec!

We were also in row 25 - not any more - so moved to 7AK 2 days before :D .
Those UC sale fares certainly help and glad to get out of the A333 given the reports of front WC closures (that would guarantee a line next to row 25).
#789655 by declansmith
30 Aug 2011, 01:34
The forward toilet is only to be locked off during boarding only and inflight should be avaliable for the use of Premium passengers.

There are 3 toilets located at the L/R2 doors and two are for Economy and 1 is for Premium.

If you find crew not allowing use of the toilet at the front in Premium then you should write in so that it can be followed up with the crew why they locked it off inflight.
#789696 by stevebrass
30 Aug 2011, 14:05
AlecK wrote:The crew we had on the A330 at Easter denied the front WC even existed !

On a side note we have just been booted out of row 25 in PE as it's apparently now been decided this is allocation at airport only. Phoned up to enquire why and ended up in UC the day before thanks to sale fares :)

That explains why we have been booted out of 25 next April.

Wish I'd gone for the later VS73 now; but there again with refits taking place who knows what aircraft you might get.
#789700 by stevebrass
30 Aug 2011, 14:25
stevebrass wrote:
AlecK wrote:The crew we had on the A330 at Easter denied the front WC even existed !

On a side note we have just been booted out of row 25 in PE as it's apparently now been decided this is allocation at airport only. Phoned up to enquire why and ended up in UC the day before thanks to sale fares :)

That explains why we have been booted out of 25 next April.

Wish I'd gone for the later VS73 now; but there again with refits taking place who knows what aircraft you might get.


And having just checked the return VS74 on May 2nd, the seat map is now up. Row 79 bagged - for now!
Last edited by stevebrass on 30 Aug 2011, 17:04, edited 1 time in total.
#789701 by Neil
30 Aug 2011, 14:31
stevebrass wrote:
stevebrass wrote:
AlecK wrote:The crew we had on the A330 at Easter denied the front WC even existed !

On a side note we have just been booted out of row 25 in PE as it's apparently now been decided this is allocation at airport only. Phoned up to enquire why and ended up in UC the day before thanks to sale fares :)

That explains why we have been booted out of 25 next April.

Wish I'd gone for the later VS73 now; but there again with refits taking place who knows what aircraft you might get.


And having just checked the return VS73 on May 2nd, the seat map is now up. Row 79 bagged - for now!


Yes, seat maps seems to be available now - also bagged row 79 for our flight later in May.
#789702 by stevebrass
30 Aug 2011, 14:34
We should start a row 79 baggers club!
#789705 by flabound
30 Aug 2011, 15:52
stevebrass wrote:We should start a row 79 baggers club!



ooo can I join? 79K for me on fridays VS27 (if passport gets back in time (part 3 of 'the saga')for me to go)
Virgin Atlantic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: David and 171 guests

Itinerary Calendar