slinky09 wrote:Which I read with interest while having my egg and bacon ... is it real or conjecture because there's been a lot of that in the last couple of years. Time will tell.
However, KLM is not my idea of a good long haul airline, it's business seat is woeful by VS standards, lounges are poor, only recently has KLM installed PTVs across its LH fleet, it's 10 across in Y on 777s etc. Having VS run by DL / KLM would be the nail in the coffin of what made VS different IMO.
KLM is primarily a leisure airline, they cater to the holiday crowds, their product and pricing reflect this...This are also the profitable part of AF/KL.
JCBR wrote:Whilst it makes sense for the VS/DL tie up I cannot see SRB selling any of his shares as that will take him below 51% and that is not his style. If KLM get any shares they will need to get them from DL which may make the whole thing more appealing to the competition authorities.
VS would be a great and much needed jewel in the sky team group.
I cannot see DL spending $600m on a non controlling stock purchase, however, if SRB can be convinced to sell part of his 51% to AF/KL then who knows.
From my view point, it's not so much VS, but the large number of LHR slots that DL is looking at, with that said, a VS/DL joint venture would be able to run an hourly shuttle service from JFK in much the same way as BA/AA are doing now.
It would also fill in a lot of blanks for the DL FF people, the US West Coast would finally get non stop service to LHR.
crofty wrote:If Delta do become involved, will VS have to reinquish it's fight to Cuba?
Nope, VS is a UK based airline, having DL as an investor means nothing, in much the same way as AA to a large share holding in AC years ago, it did not stop AC from flying to Cuba.
northernhenry wrote:Sounds more like Singapore want out, as VS have positioned themselves into a corner with strategy...
SQ have wanted out for years, they just couldn't find anyone willing to spend the money to take a non controlling position in VS.
saverton wrote:Just seen this article - if its true it looks like we will be a part of larger FF group (potentially) -SkyMiles :0
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20576420
Yep, a few years ago VS and DL FF's were allowed to book on each others airlines, the results were nearly zero availability for VS flights, especially from the US west coast.
Neil wrote:Threads merged 
About time you did something.
joeyc wrote:I personally prefer the idea of a North Atlantic joint venture... a North Atlantic alliance, to fight off the invaders from the South ): and keep watch on the boundaries to the East
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/193efefa-3d5b ... z2E5db4izv
Huh, hadn't thought about that.... would VS alliance not be losing a massive asset if they cut back on their staff? I think this article is getting a little ahead of itself.
Incompetent and disposible.. no;
Inconsistent.. maybe ii) ;
Helpful, courteous and always willing to go that extra mile .. most definitely
It would not be in any potential investors interests to start firing the staff or making people redundant. It may save a few quid in the short run, but big picture wise they will watch as pax and FF abandon ship, therefore unlikely to happen.
Although do we think that if Delta and/or AF-KLM did invest, that they would take an active roll in running VS? I think Delta would, they would def want to funnel people into their hub at ATL, and given their ops at JFK would welcome the VS feed there.. Not sure about the Air France connection though. 
Where to start...Ok, as a 49% investor DL will have no say in staffing. They need AF/KL to get 2% of VS, then they can start to flex their muscles somewhat.
If/when DL and VS tie up their FF programs DL FF's will look at it and laugh, the majority of them will be unwilling to pay to fuel surcharge, the medallion holder will throw their toys from their prams at the idea.
IMHO, VS has been pushing a lot of it's FF out themselves, why ? who knows, but they have certainly done a good job of pushing people I know away from them.
On top of that, in most ways the DL J product is superior to the VS product, the only place where VS is better is the W cabin.
As I said above, DL/VS could easily start an hourly shuttle on the JK/LHR route.