Hamster wrote:I haven't ruled it out, just very unlikely. VS threw their toys out the pram over some T2 negotiations, so arent best of friends with LHR, BA will now use T2 until T5E is built, when AA should move in too. Now VS is much closer to SkyTeam and T2 will be *A (plus BA...). Still it is always possible that VS move into T2.
In the long long term it might be inevitable once T1 and T3 are demolished, leaving T2, T4 and T5 (assuming no T6)
Will be interesting to see what happens - VS under one roof is desirable now with short haul, but only T2 presented a solution to that, now BA is moving there is there no room for VS? Otherwise perhaps it'll remain the status quo until T3 is demolished (OT but wonder whether VS domestic will have lounge access options in T1)?
StillRedHot wrote:JFK from May.
Technically so but don't forget VS is now in the A pier and DL is in the B pier, separate security, so still no contamination from DL elites ): .
David wrote:Can anyone tell us how good/bad, profitable/unprofitable (historically) and airline Delta is ?
Try
here 
, net income of >$1bn in Q3 2012 alone. DL is one of the more successful US airlines and seems to be doing very well.
Dave2009 wrote:Hope i'm not going to sound stupid in saying this but as someone who doesn't know much about mergers in this industry what will this mean for customers?... will there be a join product/cabin/liverly such as the Continental/United merger? or will it just be like with BA and Iberia where they just have codeshare services? 
Doubt it, just as BA and IB and AA continue to have different products so will DL and VS. It's not a takeover (sorry merger) as CO and UA was.
JCBR wrote:It will be interesting to se how this affects partnerships - especially with the many *A partners.
It is assumed but not guaranteed that VS will join SkyTeam but when SQ help 49% they never joined *A so nothing if definite.
Indeed - perhaps no change there after all other odd partnerships exist, but you have to believe that VS will join ST and one by one *A will go. Was it ever that useful anyway (apart from TP runs on SQ)?
Moley wrote:So does this mean that VS can now plan to launch a LHR-Singapore service ...
Although not privy to the detail it was always suggested that SQ's share and agreement prevented VS from going to many places in Asia including SIN. The answer to that question will come down to slots, aircraft availability, and priorities!
As it sinks in I think it's a very good thing, great shot in the arm for VS, a longer term strategy for growth, and retention of the brand. Yes the worries are clubhouse contamination, redemptions disappearing (with the caveat the US fliers think our fuel surcharges are barmy), and some loss of VS style and flavour, but good.