This is the main V-Flyer Forum for general discussion of everything related to flying with Virgin-branded travel companies.
#841550 by wraf137
25 Mar 2013, 13:29
In February 2012, I flew Virgin PE from Manchester to Las Vegas return. Both flights were in the ‘bubble’ of a 747, pre-refurbishment. On the outward journey in particular the PE product was excellent. Newspapers and magazines were offered and a bottle of water provided. Drinks were offered regularly by the dedicated cabin crew, who came around and asked, as well as being available in the galley, and who always gave 2 of the small soda cans. A full bar service was offered with the main meal; there was an ice cream run and several water/juice runs; a fruit bowl was available to help yourself from; and other snacks were offered during the flight (including hot savoury snacks).

Later in the year I flew BA WTP+ and produced a comparison report between the 2 products, which came down heavily in favour of VS. And for which I got flamed (indeed, effectively accused of lying) by BA fans on another board.

Fast forward to February 2013 and a return flight from Manchester to Orlando. The outward journey was on a 2-class A330. The purple seats were comfortable and the IFE a great improvement – although the people behind us apparently couldn’t understand the concept of ‘touch screen’ and spent the flight prodding and pushing at their screens (ie the back of our seats) which was irritating. There was no amenity kit but we were aware of that cutback and for us it was no great loss. There was one drinks run after take-off. As, for once, DH wasn’t driving on arrival he decided to have a beer but there was only the choice of Heineken or Tiger which is hardly the “wide selection of beers” advertised on Virgin’s website.

Menus were handed out but by the time we were served the choice was curry, take it or leave it. So we both just had the tray without hot meal. The brownie was okay but it wasn’t a patch on the Gu desserts previously offered. Afternoon tea consisted of a small cheese and onion sandwich and small cupcake with tea, coffee or juice. There were several water/juice runs and small packets of Lovehearts were given out as we were about to land. It would seem the fresh fruit has been another victim of the cutbacks. But despite the website stating (admittedly on the economy sample menu), “Ice creams, popcorn or sweets will be served by the crew to all passengers”, we were offered none of these – well, unless the Lovehearts are meant to count as the “movie snack”. I’m fairly sure I’ve seen recent trip reports mention ice cream (or pseudo-ice cream, ie Skinny Cow) but none was provided on our flight – I don’t know if it was offered in economy.

I am no fan of any airline food but having recently read the blurb about the enhanced economy meal service, it seemed to me that they must have improved that at the expense of the PE meal service.

Return flight was upstairs on a refurbished 747. I have read good and bad reports of PE in this new configuration but our experience was unfortunately pretty poor.

First issue was with our carry-on bags. Somehow I’d either missed (or forgotten) that the overhead lockers now won’t take a standard wheeled carry-on. (Which bright spark at VS made that decision?) In fact, my wheeled carry-on is designed as a child’s bag and is considerably smaller than the standard size but it still would not fit in the overhead. Nor would DH’s non-wheeled, not particularly large rucksack. So we had to stash them in the wardrobe at the back of economy. Along with, it seemed, everyone else’s bags from both PE and economy. The overhead lockers were virtually empty but the wardrobe was crammed full – so much so that after we landed one of the cabin crew emptied it out into the galley area to avoid the chaos that could have ensued with everyone trying to dig their own bag out of the wardrobe with very little room for manoeuvre.

Both PE and economy in the bubble were full. The curtains between the 2 sections were loosened after take-off but not drawn. Immediately after take-off a queue of economy passengers formed down the aisle in PE and this continued for some time, including while the cabin crew did the drinks run. We were in the back row of PE so it wasn’t a problem for us but I can see that it would have been irritating for those in the first 2-3 rows. Throughout the flight there seemed to constantly be several people congregating in the exit door space either side of the aircraft which must have been annoying for those sitting in the economy exit row seats. The bulkhead/crew seats behind us provided a buffer so although, being in the aisle seat, I was aware people were there, it wasn’t an issue. Except for one woman who, for reasons unknown, spent an inordinate amount of time standing at the very corner of the left bulkhead, leaning into PE. It was as if she was daring herself to step over an invisible line – she would step into PE briefly and lean as if she was trying to see what people were watching on the IFE a few rows ahead, then step back again. It was really quite strange.

I’m not sure why Virgin go to the trouble of printing breakfast choices on a menu. In reality, a food carton was plonked down in front of us without us being given the option of whether we even wanted it, let alone any choice of what we were getting. They started from the back so it isn’t as if they had run out of one choice. In the event, I got one of the choices and DH the other, and they both looked utterly revolting. There was one water run made during the flight.

When it came to disembarking, any idea of PE priority disappeared completely. There was a PA announcement that the downstairs UC and PE cabins would disembark first, followed by the upstairs cabin. As we were at the back of upstairs PE, we were the first from that cabin to get downstairs, but by then passengers from the main economy cabin were flooding out and, if anything, it was as if we – and, indeed, PE and UC passengers from the front, were being held for them rather than the other way around.

Although our bags did have PE tags on them, any priority for luggage seemed also to have disappeared because we saw what seemed to be several containers worth of economy bags appear before any PE ones arrived. I do, however, accept that Virgin have little control over this and it is more an airport than an airline issue.

Last year I said that I thought BA should re-brand WTP+ as being simply larger seats and extra legroom rather than a premium product. And I’m afraid that given our recent experience, it seems that VS PE has gone the same way. We will continue to fly VS PE and BA WTP+ according to the route we need because both products do provide more physical comfort. But any idea of either of them being a genuinely premium product has now gone, and it will just be an annoyance when I see them advertised as such.
#841554 by Miss G
25 Mar 2013, 13:51
I agree with much of what you are saying here, it seems to be a steady erosion. The afternoon tea is an actual joke, I don't think I've ever seen such tiny sandwiches before, and I've said before on here that the skinny cow thing is an abomination, especially in a "premium" cabin.
#841559 by Treelo
25 Mar 2013, 14:20
Your post has echoed many of the thoughts me and the present Mrs Treelo have had recently about the VS PE product. It seems any differential between PE and Y is becoming increasingly eroded. Can't comment on BA WTP+ having never used the product. I do agree that PE offers physically more comfortable travel, but how long before pax ask if this in itself is enough?
#841560 by declansmith
25 Mar 2013, 14:29
The overhead bins on the upper deck are the same as they have always been.

Also it's normal for the crew to take the bags out for customers upon landing and place them in the galley so as to obstruct the stairs.. And it allows customers to identify there bags more easily.
#841561 by David
25 Mar 2013, 14:38
The overhead lockers upstairs are as a result of the curvature of the fuselage and nothing to do with VS but I agree, they are virtually useless if you have anything bigger than a carrier bag. Pre or post refurb they are really unusable and with the extra seats upstairs from the economy section after the refurb, it shows the wardrobes are now bursting at the seams.

It's disappointing to read about the service being diluted, especially after the recent "relaunch" and I really wonder if the potential savings VS are achieving are actually, in the bigger picture, doing more harm than good for the balance sheet.

If you used the checkin at downtown disney, it's rare for the priority baggage to work, even in upper.

Hope VS are reading these TR's

David
Last edited by David on 25 Mar 2013, 14:42, edited 1 time in total.
#841562 by LovingGold
25 Mar 2013, 14:41
Hey wraf137,
Firstly, glad to see your post was balanced identifying that sometime VS, whatever they promise, are at the mercies of others, not to say that is an excuse, just helps get your point across in more reinforced manner.
I think your post echo's lots of what has been said before, the service given by VS is visibly reducing but more importantly the standard offering seems to be hit or miss. A great experience offered by one party is not had by others on the same route or even the same flight!!
From my own point of view, ready for the onslaught here :0 , PE to me is all about the extra few inches of seat room, not the expectation of UC service and offering that is given at the pointy end of the aircraft.
Now if my view is wrong, it is only my view, VS may be marketing the product incorrectly etc, whatever it does seem that the impression overall is that the PE product is now over priced for what it is.
Saying that the take up of PE is normally very good from what I can see each time I board an aircraft so perhaps the nay-sayers are still in the minority ?|
I am sure some of the folks on here can give us figures on PE takeups on percentage or seats available. If VS do have a large percentage take up I can't see them looking at improving what they have in place now.
#841563 by JimmyC1984
25 Mar 2013, 14:42
This is exactly why as one of my company's business travel budget decision makers, I have cut virgin Atlantic out of the picture.

No more money to Richard Branson from 1st April. The product is now simply disappointing, and way way way overpriced.

Good bye vs, hello emirates and ba.;) hee hee
#841565 by LovingGold
25 Mar 2013, 14:46
JimmyC1984 wrote:As one of my company's business travel budget decision makers, I have cut virgin Atlantic out of the picture.

No more money to Richard Branson from 1st April. The product is now simply disappointing, and way way way overpriced.

Good bye vs, hello emirates and ba.;) hee hee

This makes an interesting point Jimmy. Not sure what your staff travel budget is like or what size of company you look after. Did you have any official tie with VS (Flying Co etc)??
With the projected figures that we in the press over the last few weeks it would interesting to see if VS notice a lost of corporate entity and ask question like "Why??" trying to retain and get back lost business.
#841567 by Needsomesun
25 Mar 2013, 16:21
Just my pov. It's always been about the extra seat space and a slightly quieter cabin. The price differential between Y and PE can be quite significant. We booked 7 PE seats for may 5th as soon as they became available, cost £1080 pp. the Y fare was just under £600 pp. that is quite a 'premium' for a few extra inches! If you strip out all the extras, as seems to be happening you have to wonder if it's worth the extra cost. On our last flight back from MCO in Oct last year PE was full and quite noisy. Y was about 3/4 full and went back and tried a spare seat to see if it was a bad as I remembered. I am 6 ft plus and the reduced space was ok for a while but not sure if I would be happy for 8-9 hours. A good pair of noise cancelling headphones really helps both y and PE. I do not eat the food, always bring my own including water. If you ask for a proper drink you nearly always get it so not really a problem. Since the demise of the fruit I take my own. At LGW the papers, magazines are available at the gate free to all so not a perk any more. As has been said elsewhere the marketing of PE raises expectations which nearly always leads to disappointment. Call it something other than Premium would help in mho. Looking forward to May 5th and maybe comparing notes with sotonman. So you pay your money and you take your choice. I just hope for an on time flight a a short line at mco immigration 8D the journey used to be a part of the holiday for us now it's just a necessary evil to get where you want to go and the increasing cost is now a real factor :)
#841569 by wraf137
25 Mar 2013, 16:35
David wrote:The overhead lockers upstairs are as a result of the curvature of the fuselage and nothing to do with VS but I agree, they are virtually useless if you have anything bigger than a carrier bag. Pre or post refurb they are really unusable and with the extra seats upstairs from the economy section after the refurb, it shows the wardrobes are now bursting at the seams.

It's disappointing to read about the service being diluted, especially after the recent "relaunch" and I really wonder if the potential savings VS are achieving are actually, in the bigger picture, doing more harm than good for the balance sheet.

If you used the checkin at downtown disney, it's rare for the priority baggage to work, even in upper.

Hope VS are reading these TR's

David


I can only think my memory is playing tricks on me ref the overhead lockers. As we'd never had trouble stowing our gear upstairs in PE before, I thought it must be that they had been changed as part of the refurbishment. Certainly we've never used the wardrobe before so we must have had different carry-on bags.

We didn't use the Downtown Disney check-in. In fact we were pulled from the PE queue and checked in at the UC desk at MCO.
#841572 by wraf137
25 Mar 2013, 16:43
Needsomesun wrote:Just my pov. It's always been about the extra seat space and a slightly quieter cabin. The price differential between Y and PE can be quite significant. We booked 7 PE seats for may 5th as soon as they became available, cost £1080 pp. the Y fare was just under £600 pp. that is quite a 'premium' for a few extra inches! If you strip out all the extras, as seems to be happening you have to wonder if it's worth the extra cost. On our last flight back from MCO in Oct last year PE was full and quite noisy. Y was about 3/4 full and went back and tried a spare seat to see if it was a bad as I remembered. I am 6 ft plus and the reduced space was ok for a while but not sure if I would be happy for 8-9 hours. A good pair of noise cancelling headphones really helps both y and PE. I do not eat the food, always bring my own including water. If you ask for a proper drink you nearly always get it so not really a problem. Since the demise of the fruit I take my own. At LGW the papers, magazines are available at the gate free to all so not a perk any more. As has been said elsewhere the marketing of PE raises expectations which nearly always leads to disappointment. Call it something other than Premium would help in mho. Looking forward to May 5th and maybe comparing notes with sotonman. So you pay your money and you take your choice. I just hope for an on time flight a a short line at mco immigration 8D the journey used to be a part of the holiday for us now it's just a necessary evil to get where you want to go and the increasing cost is now a real factor :)


We're the same really, just want to be more comfortable. Not bothered about the twiddly bits, but I just find it annoying not to get the product as advertised.

Amen to the noise cancelling headphones. Best travel money we've ever spent.

We were lucky with MCO immigration this time. 20 minutes from the gate to checking into the Hyatt.

And wholeheartedly agree with you that the flights used to be an enjoyable part of the holiday, but not any more. The last flight I actually enjoyed was from Denver to Chicago in the United international 1st class suite on a 777. Out of this world, I was disappointed the flight wasn't longer. Not only that, it was almost free (mileage plus $1.50 tax) :D
#841579 by PaulS
25 Mar 2013, 20:21
I can't understand why the bins are unable to take wheeled hand luggage. I flew two weeks ago on a BA 747 upper deck and had no problem stowing a full sized 4wheeled samsonite hand luggage and as for priority baggage I arrived at LGW yesterday UC and one of our bags was virtually the last onto the carousel. (Trip report to follow) surely the luggage is off loaded by VS sub contractors and therefore should be controllable especially at a VS home airport.
#841651 by MarkedMan
26 Mar 2013, 16:43
Not all airlines install the same overheads on the upper deck: BA has room for a standard carry-on, not my slightly larger TravelPro, but my Euro regulation luggage fits perfectly well. On a UA 747 there is no chance of anything but a backpack or a standard briefcase fitting up there, the wheeled carry-on briefcase BH uses (which is a tad wide for a briefcase, almost as wide as a full size hand luyggage) won't go either. BA's overhead lockers are noticeably closer to one's head, too. It's possible VS just replaced the overhead luggage bins.
Virgin Atlantic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 163 guests

Itinerary Calendar