Gatwick has a flight departing at 13:10 to Cancun with flt no: 9929, seems an unusual movement and flight number
Any ideas ?|
Any ideas ?|
FLYERZ wrote:Was at Gatwick yesterday and noticed there was another VS flight with similar flight number to Bangkok. How did this come about?
slinky09 wrote:The BKK trip was a Chelsea footie charter according to VS Source.
virginboy747 wrote:Correct
horburyflyer wrote:As others have said the VS9929 was a charter....I know someone who was on the flight. Its a corporate event in Cancun.
Jon
gfonk wrote:virginboy747 wrote:Correct
wow :0 thats awesome. Money does indeed talk hey. wow
tontybear wrote:A charter can be just as cheap as buying normal tickets but has other advantages for them as well - more tailored schedule, cargo hold for equipment etc etc.
About 5 years ago the organiaation I worked for spent £40k to hire a train to take 700 staff to Birmingham (and back !) there was a letter in the papers saying we should have just bought virgin saver tickets. Ignoring the fact that there was no chance of getting cheap tickets in the rush hour (or 700 of them) the special charter actually worked out cheaper.
tontybear wrote:gfonk wrote:virginboy747 wrote:Correct
wow :0 thats awesome. Money does indeed talk hey. wow
A charter can be just as cheap as buying normal tickets but has other advantages for them as well - more tailored schedule, cargo hold for equipment etc etc.
Chelsea, Man U and England have all chartered from VS as do the NHL teams who come over for the annual match at Wembley.
Depending on the destination and the numbers traveling the Government also charters VS (and BA) to take the PM to various summits
About 5 years ago the organiaation I worked for spent £40k to hire a train to take 700 staff to Birmingham (and back !) there was a letter in the papers saying we should have just bought virgin saver tickets. Ignoring the fact that there was no chance of getting cheap tickets in the rush hour (or 700 of them) the special charter actually worked out cheaper.
simonallardice wrote:Ahem...NFL dear Tonty, NFL.
tontybear wrote:simonallardice wrote:Ahem...NFL dear Tonty, NFL.
football (American), hockey - it's all overpaid men playing with funny shaped balls!
(yes I know ice hockey is played with a puck)
((and yes I have been to the Air Canada Center in Toronto for a tour!))
Fuzzy14 wrote:My current employer (20,000 employees) has a policy of no more than 4 employees on the same plane or train. I've had my arrangements changed before because someone in management has wanted on the same flight as me.
With the transfer value of that Chelsea team they must be paying one heck of an insurance premium to fly together.
Miss G wrote:Fuzzy14 wrote:My current employer (20,000 employees) has a policy of no more than 4 employees on the same plane or train. I've had my arrangements changed before because someone in management has wanted on the same flight as me.
With the transfer value of that Chelsea team they must be paying one heck of an insurance premium to fly together.
Why is that then? /nosey
Miss G wrote:Fuzzy14 wrote:My current employer (20,000 employees) has a policy of no more than 4 employees on the same plane or train. I've had my arrangements changed before because someone in management has wanted on the same flight as me.
With the transfer value of that Chelsea team they must be paying one heck of an insurance premium to fly together.
Why is that then? /nosey
MrSquare wrote:Miss G wrote:Fuzzy14 wrote:My current employer (20,000 employees) has a policy of no more than 4 employees on the same plane or train. I've had my arrangements changed before because someone in management has wanted on the same flight as me.
With the transfer value of that Chelsea team they must be paying one heck of an insurance premium to fly together.
Why is that then? /nosey
Miss G - bit of a failsafe policy. If you chartered an aircraft and put all of your top executives on it, and say that aircraft crashed and everyone onboard died - you'd have a very unsuccessful company in the coming days / months.
But the logic is, if you had only 3 employees on that crashed aircraft the company could still operate.
Fuzzy14 wrote:Oh you make me sound very important but I am just a tiny cog!
Yes it's incase my work looses a few members of staff in the one incident, could give us problems delivering a project (I work in oil industry so quite risk averse).
Fuzzy14 wrote:Besides if our Euromillions numbers come up there's 30 of us waking out the door, management included!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 176 guests