This is the main V-Flyer Forum for general discussion of everything related to flying with Virgin-branded travel companies.
#894009 by ratechaser
31 Jan 2015, 16:52
Interesting... Personally I put VS PE well ahead of BA's WTP, but then I've only been on 'old' WTP on a 772, whereas I've had 'new' PE (and I mean really new as in refurbed LGW fleet).

Wife was so uninspired by BA's offering that I'm never going to suggest it again on a plane with the old setup, but maybe I need to look at the new offering if they have upped their game...
#894012 by mitchja
31 Jan 2015, 16:56
I have to agree about the food served in the VS PE cabin. On my last 3 or 4 flights the PE food has been rubbish every time. Whilst it's reasonably well presented, the quality is simply not there. It's just basically an economy meal cooked in a proper dish instead of a plastic one and nothing more.
#894015 by spacedog
31 Jan 2015, 17:15
mitchja wrote:I have to agree about the food served in the VS PE cabin. On my last 3 or 4 flights the PE food has been rubbish every time. Whilst it's reasonably well presented, the quality is simply not there. It's just basically an economy meal cooked in a proper dish instead of a plastic one and nothing more.


Interestingly the last time we flew PE (inbound from NYC), we liked the food even more than what we got in UC (inbound from NRT). Seems to be quite hit or miss. The best meal we had was outbound to NRT in Upper, though.

This is also an interesting read for me as it's good to hear that WTP has been improved; I've never flown it but previously heard reports about it not being as good as PE, so it's nice to know we might have an alternative if needed.
#894016 by LHRrules
31 Jan 2015, 17:34
Having just flown the new BA WT plus I can vouch for the fact the new cabin is far, far better than it used to be. The seats and IFE are much improved and the main course from the Club menu was very good indeed. On a long flight there were 3 services! Certainly wasn't hungry..

Well worth a try
#894019 by polb74
31 Jan 2015, 17:44
Seems a little unfair to compare the old PE with the new WTplus, surely a like for like comparison would've allowed us to make a better informed choice.
#894021 by Hev60
31 Jan 2015, 17:51
LHRrules wrote:Having just flown the new BA WT plus I can vouch for the fact the new cabin is far, far better than it used to be. The seats and IFE are much improved and the main course from the Club menu was very good indeed. On a long flight there were 3 services! Certainly wasn't hungry..

Well worth a try


So did you get priority check-in, boarding & exiting? Did you get a welcome drink? and was your luggage delivered onto the conveyor speedily on landing.

BA certainly needed to improve their WT+ service but until it includes all the VS PE benefits as standard, then a bit of good food wouldn't make us go backwards ii)
#894022 by Smid
31 Jan 2015, 17:52
I didn't really think about it at the time, but yes, the PE food was economy level. It wasn't even close to as good as I remembered from 5 years ago.

Surprised about the screens. I know the Club screens on the Chicago 747 were pretty crappy and really bad quality, earlier this month...
#894040 by FLYERZ
31 Jan 2015, 20:56
I think its hard to compare as both BA and VS currently have different offerings because of newer and older aircraft. BA WTP on an old 747 is hardly a good comparison with PE on a VS A330 and the same with VS A340-300 and the newer BA A380.

My thoughts are that aircraft aside, BA wins over VS in PE for food - offering something closer to Business Class meals, whereas VS meals in PE are more like economy, but you get the benefit of priority boarding and drinks before take off. Different strokes for different fokes I guess
#894048 by Virginlondon
31 Jan 2015, 23:08
Having originally not liked the new WTP - I do now. Feels like you have more room and the choice of TV is much better.

The overall look and feel of Virgin is better - but can be quite tight when the seat in front is reclined.

To be fair they are both good - was surprised to hear this week that Cathay are pulling PE on some flights. I think it's a great concept.
#894054 by slinky09
01 Feb 2015, 08:45
I too have often wondered what the point of just having one episode of a good series is when flying on VS and watching Vera. It's dumb and frustrating. BA having boxed sets is a great idea, VS should have done that years ago.
#894066 by at240
01 Feb 2015, 11:08
In my experience PE food went through a real dip but then recovered a few years ago. It is a lot better than Y, which really does border on the inedible.
#894071 by gfonk
01 Feb 2015, 11:51
interesting article but how is it possible for him to have already flown the return on BA if the last returning VS flight was today?
#894074 by Smid
01 Feb 2015, 12:39
Too much credit to the pre flight drink though. It's a thimble size now. I think less than 100ml...
#894075 by gfonk
01 Feb 2015, 12:58
Virginlondon wrote:Think he was moved to BA as Virgin cancelled the flight on the day he was travelling.

pardon me if im being dumb (which I obviously am) but that still doesnt make sense to me as today was the last flight from NRT to LHR on VS? so why would he have flown BA on inbound flight back to LHR prior to this? if this article was written during next week it would make sense.
#894086 by LHRrules
01 Feb 2015, 14:25
Because Virgin have been cancelling flights on certain days recently, and therefore he asked to be put on a BA flight on that day.
#894092 by gfonk
01 Feb 2015, 14:52
LHRules thanks I knew it was me being dumb lol
#894094 by NYLON
01 Feb 2015, 14:58
Ex-UK, gluten free meals are the great equalizer. He's my article comparing the two like-for-like:

BA WT: chicken; but VS EC: chicken
BA WT+: chicken; whereas VS PE: chicken
BA CW: chicken; however VS UC: chicken
BA F: chicken; (VS flight crew GF meal: chicken.)
#894095 by gumshoe
01 Feb 2015, 15:05
NYLON wrote:Ex-UK, gluten free meals are the great equalizer. He's my article comparing the two like-for-like:

BA WT: chicken; but VS EC: chicken
BA WT+: chicken; whereas VS PE: chicken
BA CW: chicken; however VS UC: chicken
BA F: chicken; (VS flight crew GF meal: chicken.)


Haha airlines love chicken because almost everyone can eat it, whatever their faith or diet (apart from vegetarians & vegans obviously). And even better, it's cheap!
#894102 by pjh
01 Feb 2015, 16:25
I think VS response is entirely valid. The new WT+ offering is not, as I understand it, being offered on any of VS 747 aircraft so it isn't a consistent comparison across either fleet,

As to the food, the menu seems to be the same as my flight back from GRU on BA in WT+ and it was possibly the worst food I have ever had long haul. Beef, but not as we know it, Jim. Far below the standard of recent Economy offerings on Turkish, Emirates and BA on the the way out to GRU.
Virgin Atlantic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Tfawkes and 176 guests

Itinerary Calendar