This is the main V-Flyer Forum for general discussion of everything related to flying with Virgin-branded travel companies.
#919513 by tontybear
03 Apr 2016, 05:24
Looks like it's Alaska
#919552 by JCBR
03 Apr 2016, 20:58
What is concerning is that Alaska have pretty much said that they have little interest in keep VA alive - they just want the airport slots.
This is a shame because VX have by far the best service and seating on any domestic USA carrier I have flown.
Also they plan to get rid of the 320's and have a 737 only fleet.
Last edited by JCBR on 04 Apr 2016, 08:13, edited 1 time in total.
#919556 by honey lamb
03 Apr 2016, 23:37
JCBR wrote:What is concerning is that Alaska have pretty much said that they have little interest in keep VA alive - they just want the airport slots.
This is a shame because VA have by far the best service and seating on any domestic USA carrier I have flown.
Also they plan to get rid of the 320's and have a 737 only fleet.

While I accept your concerns, I have flown several sectors on Alaska and whereas they don't have the same pizazz as Alaska, they really aren't a bad airline. When I consider internal airlines in the US, I would rate Alaska, Virgin America and Jet Blue as the ones that stand out.
#919570 by mitchja
04 Apr 2016, 11:17
Having flown Alaska several times between SFO and PSP (there is an overlap on that route, though VX only fly to PSP seasonally), Alaska are an 'OK' airline, nothing special and nothing much more than a 'get you from A to B' airline though.

There may well be some stipulation in the sale that they must keep the Virgin brand name possibly? Remember that Virgin are always very very particular about how their brand name is always used.
#919590 by JCBR
04 Apr 2016, 17:52
Worth remembering that this was not a hostile takeover. VX put themselves up for sale which probably means the management spotted turbulence ahead.
No one has (so far) offered to take a kick down below if the Virgin America brand is still around in 5 years so it will likely disappear along with the VX planes - most of which are leased until 2018 so the timing probably works out just great for Alaska.
The thought of flying on a plane with an image of Robert Maxwell on the tail is very unappealing.
#919630 by mitchja
05 Apr 2016, 21:06
They are and good luck even get getting miles & TP's credited to your BAEC account for AS flights. Everytime I've flown on AS and had my BAEC number on the booking, the points never credit and I've always had to send off boarding passes to BA, plus you get next to nothing points wise and zero TP's on all of AS's lowest fares anyway.
#919679 by Darren Wheeler
06 Apr 2016, 15:24
A shame to be sure. Only my VX flights were great and world away from most internal US flights. Personally I thought JetBlue was a better buyer as they have a similar ethos to flights, shame the Alaska deal was better. Goodbye white leather first class seats.
#919680 by tontybear
06 Apr 2016, 16:19
Edinburgh Castle wrote:Clearly regulatory constraints on ownership is a key factor here but also given Virgin's extensive tie up with Delta in the States. I have always wondered how VS code share with Delta would sit easily with Virgin America. Odd juxtaposition from my perspective.


VS had an arrangement with DL as an 'ordinary' partner airline long before VX got off the ground so it's always something that has been there and remember that VX is a totally separate company to VS with different shareholders etc
Virgin Atlantic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 169 guests

Itinerary Calendar