mikethe3rd wrote:gumshoe wrote:Slightly unfair given it's a whole lot easier to provide wifi over land than it is over the ocean. And last time I looked JetBlue didn't fly transatlantic!
But the average passenger isn't going to care. Sending a PR about 3 live TV channels in 2005 would be a good breakthough for a transatlantic carrier. Sending a PR about 3 live TV channels in 2016 and I think most would wonder 'why only now?'
I would disagree, Think of the USA & say dish network - they offer satellite service the length & width of the country. So that is a big mesh of coverage from their satellites. Would be quite easy to offer live TV (I believe Dish Network does do this on some flights?)
Now if you look at Europe of a similar size, there is multiple markets, multiple languages. Sky UK satellite footprint is not designed to offer services in Spain for example (You can get Sky in Spain with a very big dish!). A provider would need to pay for bandwidth on each satellite it needed to use to beam their channel. So to cover the majority of Europe alone you would be looking at using satellites belonging to Astra, Eutelsat, Thor, Hotbird & Hispasat.
As you go transatlantic, that is thousand of miles that have less satellite beams. So would be quite difficult to provide service on a whim of an idea.
Think of XM radio in the US - Satellite based Radio & why we do not get it in the UK/Europe.