spiceke wrote:So many conflicting stories. BA test flight, but Sky said it didn't go through the cloud (also read that it is impossible to detect this stuff on radar, but not sure about that) then we have the F-16 damage. I would tend to believe the F-16 damage as they have no vested interest. BA want / need to get things moving again.
BA flew the Jumbo from ground up to 40,000 feet and found no difference to normal operations. No one is suggesting that any aircraft flies through the volcano plume or cloud - has anyone seen a volcano ash cloud in the clear blue skies over Britain these last few days?
The Finnish F16 could have flown through the actual cloud - we're not privy to their locations and it's not likely that they'll be released because they may have been on NATO air defense ops. For all we know they were flying above Iceland but we never will.
At this moment I can see about three dozen aircraft flying in Europe in what our NATS believes is unsafe air. No problems reported. As I said, I think this is completely over egged.
spiceke wrote:Aeroflot still flying? Isn't this the airline that has planes virtually held togeher by duck tape. Health & Safety (and I do normally hate that industry) isnot at the forefront of Aeroflots agenda.
No, Aeroflot flies a modern fleet of largely Airbuses and Boeings. Aeroflot has been flying continually with no problems reported.
Magic isn't it if all the supposed ash suddenly disappears tomorrow :w .