tontybear wrote:PilotWolf wrote:And how could a US dog be trained by a UK organisation?
PW
That's not what it says in the various quotes and links.
It says something like 'accredited by' which means that the UK guide dogs association recognises the training of the U.S. association as being equivalent to UK training (and vice versa) and the dog can travel in the cabin but that another country might not be accredited and so that dog wound need to go in the hold as a pet.
Edited to add this from PilotWolf's very first post on this
If your dog has not been trained by an accredited charity ...
No, not at all!
The list is specific to what is acceptable and does not cater to what a UK organization accepts and as I have said SERVICE dogs are not limited to guide dogs.
My wife has a service dog that is trained to provide a specific medical need to her, a need that has been certified by a doctor, a dog that provides this need and is trained to provide the required 'service' is not a pet and as such should not be treated as such by any airline that accepts bookings from a country that recognizes this dog's status.
Suppose she was blind but the dog was trained by an organization that isn't in the list? Should she fumble around in the cabin or the UK for 2 or 3 days?
What about the search and rescue dogs that fly into disaster zones? Should people die because they're classified as pets due to being trained by the wrong people?
What about the distress to the dog of being separated from it's handler? My wife's dog becomes very distressed if for example she showers or closes the toilet door with him outside - he knows that when she is out of sight he cannot perform the job he was trained for.
The US accepts the UK drivers license and vice versa but they don't care who taught you to drive.
Pets are allowed into the UK anyway (subject to the criteria of rabies/chipping/etc.), albeit with a delay so why the issue with a service animal? It is the animal reception staff that have the increased work load not the airline; the paperwork is the dog handler's responsibility not the airlines.
Maybe a few 'fake' service dogs will make it through and yes that damages the reputation of the genuine ones but what effect does that have on VA (or any UK airline)?
The law here doesn't prevent business owners (etc.), from requiring the dog to be removed from the premises if it misbehaves. However 99.9% of service dogs are better behaved than the humans...
My employer (a passenger carrying company) requires dogs to be muzzled on board, unfortunately though we have no such requirements for obnoxious/drunk/rude/self-important/loud/****holes humans or children.
I hate to fuel the 'USA sue everyone' culture but I kind of want to book a flight with a UK carrier and turn up at the gate with the wife's service dog and see what happens... Then if they refuse us travel find a pro-bono lawyer who will fight them in court for breaching the ADA because they are on USA 'soil'. I know that a UK aircraft is technically UK territory but I wonder what happens if you break the law of the country that the aircraft is parked in?
PW