This is the main V-Flyer Forum for general discussion of everything related to flying with Virgin-branded travel companies.
#907244 by dickydotcom
16 Jul 2015, 08:35
AmexVflyer wrote:I thought I recognised Rodrigo from somewhere, I am sure he has also appeared on another TV programme about plastic surgery. He, apparently, has spent over £100k on plastic surgery!!!! :-O :-O :-O :-O :-O

Not bad for a minimum wage earner.
Dick D
#907254 by AlanA
16 Jul 2015, 11:18
Darren Wheeler wrote:
Plus, since when have 'disabled toilets' been for disabled only?


I sincerely hope you are joking with that comment Darren?

Since always. Disabled toilets are a requirement if the old disability discrimination act and the replacement equalities act.
They are for together use of disabled, not abled people, due to the fact that because if certain disabilities either the abled toilets are not fit for purpose or the disability can be bowel related. Majority if disabled toilets have a RADAR key requirement so that the toilet is available for disabled use only.

It's like saying "disabled parking spaces" are for general use....
#907255 by pjh
16 Jul 2015, 11:20
Darren Wheeler wrote:
Pete wrote:
AlanA wrote:Slight but of annoyance on some of the disabled sites, of VS using the disabled toilet as a make up r,ooh at the start, more down the route of "encouraging able people to abuse the disabled toilets" not a good view of Virgin for this, that also started the comments about the cruddy service given to the disabled.....


I'm assuming they'd hired out that whole venue for their launch event, so don't suppose they were denying anyone access.


Plus, since when have 'disabled toilets' been for disabled only?


I can't remember how I came across a discussion of this, but I did recently where there was cogent argument that it should be the case that the able bodied should not use disabled toilets as it is potentially denying access to those who really need them and have no alternative.
#907259 by 15isto2
16 Jul 2015, 12:03
AmexVflyer wrote:I thought I recognised Rodrigo from somewhere, I am sure he has also appeared on another TV programme about plastic surgery. He, apparently, has spent over £100k on plastic surgery!!!! :-O :-O :-O :-O :-O


I think he looks quite creepy to be honest
#907274 by Gerrym
16 Jul 2015, 16:44
Bretty wrote:Uuurgh! Not impressed by the UNIQ who commented about not getting a "happy ending" after a massage! >-(

Dirty old man.


Met him at a Virgin Atlantic event a few weeks ago, really nice bloke.

Gerry
#907276 by Darren Wheeler
16 Jul 2015, 17:55
AlanA wrote:
Darren Wheeler wrote:
Plus, since when have 'disabled toilets' been for disabled only?


I sincerely hope you are joking with that comment Darren?

Since always. Disabled toilets are a requirement if the old disability discrimination act and the replacement equalities act.
They are for together use of disabled, not abled people, due to the fact that because if certain disabilities either the abled toilets are not fit for purpose or the disability can be bowel related. Majority if disabled toilets have a RADAR key requirement so that the toilet is available for disabled use only.

It's like saying "disabled parking spaces" are for general use....


The sign on the door in question designates the toilet as unisex and disabled. You see these in places that don't have the space for separate toilets or wish to have a 'quick win' to comply with the disabilities laws. Starbucks is an example of such a place. Just because the door has the disabled symbol on it does not mean it is a disabled only toilet.

The VS 787's have a very similar sign on the front 2 toilets.
#907323 by tontybear
17 Jul 2015, 08:33
pjh wrote:
Darren Wheeler wrote:Plus, since when have 'disabled toilets' been for disabled only?


I can't remember how I came across a discussion of this, but I did recently where there was cogent argument that it should be the case that the able bodied should not use disabled toilets as it is potentially denying access to those who really need them and have no alternative.


There was one on flyer talk in the last couple of weeks. Is that the one you are thinking of?

The issue is that there are some people - as in the woman who remonstrated with the poster of that thread - who still have the belief that disability = crippled and that people with hidden disabilities aren't really disabled. She had no idea whether the poster of that thread was disabled or not - she just assumed "he can walk so he's not disabled".

Apparently she just had a walking stick - did that automatically make her disabled?

Many local authorities use the term 'accessible' in planning guidance because there are many people who are not disabled but who have other needs e.g. parent and small child where a larger room is better for them.

TBH I have no compunction in using accessible toilets when necessary. And what do those who say that the non-disabled shouldn't use them when an accessible one is the only one available in many places? And where there is more than one toilet and no one who requires an accessible is using it surely it makes sense for the facility to be used for the comfort of all?
#907341 by gfonk
17 Jul 2015, 11:18
Bretty wrote:Uuurgh! Not impressed by the UNIQ who commented about not getting a "happy ending" after a massage! >-(

Dirty old man.


LOL yeah agreed!! bit embarrassing!!

I watched the first episode last night and actually quite enjoyed it. I especially liked the photo call auditions and the attitude of the staff who attended all seemed really cool. cant imagine the same with BA :-P

made me miss flying VS. After reading Brettys TR about SFO I am feeling inspired. Mrs GFONK wants to go to vegas too so....:-)
#907357 by Bretty
17 Jul 2015, 17:46
gfonk wrote:
Bretty wrote:Uuurgh! Not impressed by the UNIQ who commented about not getting a "happy ending" after a massage! >-(

Dirty old man.


LOL yeah agreed!! bit embarrassing!!

I watched the first episode last night and actually quite enjoyed it. I especially liked the photo call auditions and the attitude of the staff who attended all seemed really cool. cant imagine the same with BA :-P

made me miss flying VS. After reading Brettys TR about SFO I am feeling inspired. Mrs GFONK wants to go to vegas too so....:-)

And it's 140 days since your BA flight to Tokyo, you're long overdue TRs, chop chop Mr, chop chop...
#907373 by JCBR
18 Jul 2015, 07:57
AmexVflyer wrote:I thought I recognised Rodrigo from somewhere, I am sure he has also appeared on another TV programme about plastic surgery. He, apparently, has spent over £100k on plastic surgery!!!! :-O :-O :-O :-O :-O


Why would you pay good money to look like Andrew Lloyd Webber ?
#907377 by enjoyingit
18 Jul 2015, 09:42
JCBR wrote:
AmexVflyer wrote:I thought I recognised Rodrigo from somewhere, I am sure he has also appeared on another TV programme about plastic surgery. He, apparently, has spent over £100k on plastic surgery!!!! :-O :-O :-O :-O :-O


Why would you pay good money to look like Andrew Lloyd Webber ?


:D :D :D :D :D :D :D
#907382 by gfonk
18 Jul 2015, 10:29
Bretty wrote:
gfonk wrote:
Bretty wrote:Uuurgh! Not impressed by the UNIQ who commented about not getting a "happy ending" after a massage! >-(

Dirty old man.


LOL yeah agreed!! bit embarrassing!!

I watched the first episode last night and actually quite enjoyed it. I especially liked the photo call auditions and the attitude of the staff who attended all seemed really cool. cant imagine the same with BA :-P

made me miss flying VS. After reading Brettys TR about SFO I am feeling inspired. Mrs GFONK wants to go to vegas too so....:-)

And it's 140 days since your BA flight to Tokyo, you're long overdue TRs, chop chop Mr, chop chop...

doh! thats true. lol :blush:
i better get writing, but first of all shopping trip for crans later in the week.
#907452 by Daniel Armstrong
20 Jul 2015, 09:49
Caught up yesterday - was hoping that I could do all episodes back to back, but I think I arrived at the party a little to early for that. Shame, as it looks like it rolls together nicely.

The one thing that stood out for me was - this is much better than the BA version, another thing VS can do better! From the cabin crew training (where the BA one seemed like it was about getting rid of people and being harsh) to the clubhouse it has again rekindled my love for the brand.

Yes, there were some horrific inaccuracy's and some very 'cringe worthy' moments. The 'happy endings' line was a bit silly - I will go out on a limb and say it was a hot rush of blood to the head as he was on TV. Also, the 'who are BA' response in NY from the CC when they were doing the publicity. Would have been better to ask why fly BA and actually try to win the custom, in my opinion - although, I do again believe if the cameras were not there it would have been very different.

I also must say, credit to the chaps in the warehouse - they come across very well...

Overall it was fun to watch and I believe VS come out looking very good. I did hear somewhere (cant recall now, I think a colleague at work) but after the second show they went to look at VS flights and the website was down due to too much traffic. If so, fair play - that site must have massive bandwidth so lets hope they got some bookings from it to help them get back to a decent profit..!

Next I would be very keen to see a show on Virgin Holidays - how the staff there have the uniform and have to live up to the Brand - also what they do from shop to shore... Perhaps follow a few holiday makers from booking in a Tesco (how very unglamorous!) to getting their cars at the airport - and of course the flights...
#907558 by Maximus
21 Jul 2015, 22:19
At the end of tonights episode it said, "In memory of Pat"

Who was Pat?
#907561 by honey lamb
21 Jul 2015, 22:30
Maximus wrote:At the end of tonights episode it said, "In memory of Pat"

Who was Pat?

The postman in the first episode. Judging by his accent he was from Cork. :D And more specifically, the north side of the city.
#907564 by Maximus
21 Jul 2015, 23:54
honey lamb wrote:
Maximus wrote:At the end of tonights episode it said, "In memory of Pat"

Who was Pat?

The postman in the first episode. Judging by his accent he was from Cork. :D And more specifically, the north side of the city.


Can you not narrow it down to the Street in the north side of Cork HL? :-P
Virgin Atlantic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 176 guests

Itinerary Calendar